Maggie Wallis
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 69
Guys who cares?
Quest says build smithy so you build a smithy k?
Finally some one speaks some sense!!!!
Guys who cares?
Quest says build smithy so you build a smithy k?
So you are saying when a farming discussion came up on the no hauls forum, no one should comment? (people did)bangs head.
No one said you were lying either.
Zarddeath please if you flame some for inefficient farming and I point out that on THIS world being inefficient does not matter so much is no good saying you were speaking generally when we on the UK11 forum?
Also as we all know are other reasons for sending out swords with your sp why say is inefficient when you do it yourself?!
Funniest thing I have read in years.I comment to teach people.
Funniest thing I have read in years.
If it is pre-LC then as I said your point is mute because of the distance the speed difference is very small, and spears by themselves die. I don't tihnk you are reading what I am typing.
However I am reading what you are typing
I believe you said you are farming with Swords, no?
So what method of teaching hah what it be if you are not doing what you are saying? Perhaps you should go back and take a look at your posts you may get some tips from yourself if you think you are that correct. Or does speed not concern you that much when it is yourself?
Then you were having a different conversation than I.The conversation was Swords and Spears, or Spears by themselves to increase speed.
Actually I didYou never mentioned axes. Don't change it now.
No, if lets say you send 10sw and 20sp versus 30sp. At 1 space away, 20sp and 10 sw farms 836 res per hour. 30sp farms 1250 per hour. That is a difference of 414 resources per hour, or 50% (almost exactly) of the smaller number. At 10 spaces, the first group farms 88.62 per hour, and the larger group farms 125 per hour. Same numbers, divided by 10, same percentage difference, 50% of the smaller number.And Percentage stays the same with distance yes, but you are talking about time taken, and what that percentage represents shrinks as the distance shrinks so I am afraid distance is all too relevant when talking about wasting time using swords.
Yes, he doesn't yet have a smithy.Axes with Spears versus Swords with Spears would have at least been a worthwhile discussion and it was touched upon briefly by Monty Python who apparently could resist after all.
generally, research cost and lower wood cost. This world, because I have yet to recruit a single troops, so am splitting with both.Anyway you stated earlier that at the moment you are farming with Swords. You still havent answered why you farm with Swords when you say they slow it down?
T
generally, research cost and lower wood cost. This world, because I have yet to recruit a single troops, so am splitting with both.
@ljo
I never said he was farming inefficiently (quote me saying that). I said his argument for swords>axes was flawed.
He was playing inefficiently if he built smithy without losing troops, that I did say. I did not say he was farming inefficiently.
Please (both of you) read my posts in the future, don't read into them what you want to think, or what you think I think, read what I say, and things will be clearer. I have yet to contradict or disagree with myself, like both of you seem to think.
That is a fallacious argument. Swords slow your spears, making them less efficient.
generally, research cost and lower wood cost. This world, because I have yet to recruit a single troops, so am splitting with both.
I have yet to recruit a single troops, so am splitting with both.
Mathmatically spears are the best thing to send to keep the spears alive. :icon_redface: I would explain why, but I doubt many here would get it, and the lack of understanding everyone is showing in this thread is amusing so I would rather it continue!Now I merely said why would you say sending swords makes farming inefficient on a low haul world?! Especially when you were teaching (yay I remembered) us not to build a smithy (so no axes) then surely swords would be the best escort to keep the sp alive?
So you have no axes, seeing as you had to recruit 10 spears to get them? Infact you only have 10 spears and 10 swords. :icon_rolleyes:
No, if lets say you send 10sw and 20sp versus 30sp. At 1 space away, 20sp and 10 sw farms 836 res per hour. 30sp farms 1250 per hour. That is a difference of 414 resources per hour, or 50% (almost exactly) of the smaller number. At 10 spaces, the first group farms 88.62 per hour, and the larger group farms 125 per hour. Same numbers, divided by 10, same percentage difference, 50% of the smaller number.
So, you are wrong. Care to continue with that train of thought?
But your all missing the relevant points.. the Smithy looks pretty in my village
And you just changed your argument in its entirety. The argument I was responding to was that percentages change changes based on travel time. Care to comment on THAT SINGLE PIECE OF INFORMATION?I would. As I have said the spears are no good if they die and you have again said nothing about these axes you have recently added to your conversation to have a point. Your spears you sent above die as you dont hav 30 apparently you still only have 10 and they just got spiked. You now have no res. Now if you want to include axes then the difference in speed is negligable between axes and swords, if that is what you are talking about instead then give those figures.
I haven't :icon_rolleyes:As for your constant contradicting yourself and other points I think that others have answered well, and will leave them to explain instead.
And you just changed your argument in its entirety. The argument I was responding to was that percentages change changes based on travel time. Care to comment on THAT SINGLE PIECE OF INFORMATION?
And Percentage stays the same with distance yes, but you are talking about time taken, and what that percentage represents shrinks as the distance shrinks so I am afraid distance is all too relevant when talking about wasting time using swords.