W12 and start up tribes

DeletedUser

Guest
I believe that is knk not KnK ;) Though you might well be in a position to answer if the old dukes and some players from W7 KnK are now playing in the same tribe in 12?

Edit: its ok ill take BigonesAL word for it :p
 

DeletedUser8768

Guest
There may be a few players on w12, In fact, there definately are, as there are from most other uk worlds that are either winding down, or ended.

Some may be playing in the same tribe, same names, different names..

Some may be in other tribes, some are playing other worlds only, or as well as w12..

I wouldnt let any of it concern you, KnK were gifted there win on w7 afterall were they not by the talented leaving early, no threat even if the whole tribe were playing as one...........

Ill be either playing, or watching very closely, hopefully for everyone playing its an enjoyable, challenging world.
 

Nauzhror

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
106
There may be a few players on w12, In fact, there definately are, as there are from most other uk worlds that are either winding down, or ended.

Some may be playing in the same tribe, same names, different names..

Some may be in other tribes, some are playing other worlds only, or as well as w12..

I wouldnt let any of it concern you, KnK were gifted there win on w7 afterall were they not by the talented leaving early, no threat even if the whole tribe were playing as one...........

Ill be either playing, or watching very closely, hopefully for everyone playing its an enjoyable, challenging world.


I don't see anyone claiming you were gifted an easy win, though you're most definitely playing, and co-leading LoL. you're not early as incognito as you're trying to be. :icon_razz:
 

DeletedUser8768

Guest
I don't see anyone claiming you were gifted an easy win, though you're most definitely playing, and co-leading LoL. you're not early as incognito as you're trying to be. :icon_razz:

You possibly would'nt see anyonne claiming we were gifted an easy win..

Comments were made some time ago, some public, some private, and I guess it would depend on how you interpret peoples words..
None of that is relevant I guess.


I just had to google "incognito", keep it simple for me please, Im not Pablo or Mike who are a bit more sociable and educated than myself lol.


If I am playing, am I doing anything different from anyone else who is playing under a differet name?

I understand you are keeping your profile quiet through fear of having your barbs spiked.
(I use the word fear very loosely, this is a game, I know your not actually scared lol... Ive read some of your posts before, I know your bound to pick up on it :icon_biggrin: )

The truth is, nobody knows if I am actually playing w12 or not, and why would anyone care, I'm no start up guru, and I'm too lazy for late game (many will confirm this lol)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
The truth is, nobody knows if I am actually playing w12 or not, and why would anyone care, I'm no start up guru, and I'm too lazy for late game (many will confirm this lol)


I Care.

Reason - If you are on this world then I know there is a tribe playing that has experianced and player friendly leadership (Only can be a good thing)

Also, as can be seen here, I know that you and the players of KnK come on these externals a bit and generates interesting posts.

If you are playing (which lets face it you are) then you may not be in a good start up tribe, but is glad that your a tribe that is here at start up.

;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Nauzhror

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
106
If you are playing (which lets face it you are) then you may not be in a good start up tribe, but is glad that your a tribe that is here at start up.

His tribe has the highest average per player of any tribe in the top 20. I wouldn't write them off at startup by any means. Are they startup monsters, like Pandas, or Rumble, or RA? No, but they can more than hold their own against the rest of this worlds's offerings I wager.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
His tribe has the highest average per player of any tribe in the top 20. I wouldn't write them off at startup by any means. Are they startup monsters, like Pandas, or Rumble, or RA? No, but they can more than hold their own against the rest of this worlds's offerings I wager.


Nauz Nauz Nauz, I expect so much....... Yet....... SHAC are the current best start up tribe for points in the top 20....
 

DeletedUser6695

Guest
SHAC are bad...seriously people hyping them up is irritating

edit: belle is good <3
 

DeletedUser

Guest
SHAC are bad...seriously people hyping them up is irritating

edit: belle is good <3

That wasnt hype, that was fact. SHAC are the best start up tribe for points per player in the current world 12 top 20 tribes.

Your comment however has no grounding in fact whatsoever

They weren't top 20 when I posted.

16 mins.... im less than convinced.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Really need to stop throwing "start up tribe" around so loosely.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
My opinion doesn't need factual support :/

Of course it doesnt, I was just pointing out the facts for other players :)

OT:

Avg points per player, top 5 tribes.

SHAC - 255
Lol - 250
SFU - 246
ReHaB -244
T.L.H (Ruffus tribe) - 239
 

DeletedUser6695

Guest
Yes but as OHKO stated above, calling SHAC a start up tribe is well silly.

They are by no means good at 'start up'
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Really need to stop throwing "start up tribe" around so loosely.

I was just using the avg points per player as a mark due to the fact that before CF started trolling it was the mark that Nauz used and I replied to.

Im sure the tribes that have good start up builds and troops will post in the forums soon enough :D

Yes but as OHKO stated above, calling SHAC a start up tribe is well silly.

They are by no means good at 'start up'

Meh. >Shakes head and wonders off<
 

Nauzhror

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
106
Yes but as OHKO stated above, calling SHAC a start up tribe is well silly.

They are by no means good at 'start up'


Agreed.

For a proper comparison, this is what average points per player looks like when a tribe that excels at startup is present looks like:

1. Pandas: 2,099
2. ~G*K~: 1,420
3. Fleeto: 1,325
4. PG: 1,264
5. NiBBLE: 1,213

Can't find earlier than that since Pandas didn't enter the top 20 till that point.

Here though no tribe really stands out in regards to early-game talent. There's no tribe that will be hitting the APP milestones before anyone else reaches the previous tier (meaning how Pandas was 1st to 10k points per player before any other tribe had hit 5k, etc.), etc.

I actually think it's a good thing for the health of the world though on a long-term basis, a fairly level playing field is a lot more fun.
 

DeletedUser

Guest

SHAC are not a specialist start up tribe like have appeared b4, however the assertion that they are bad at start up in direct relation to other tribes playing this world is yet to be seen.


Here though no tribe really stands out in regards to early-game talent. There's no tribe that will be hitting the APP milestones before anyone else reaches the previous tier (meaning how Pandas was 1st to 10k points per player before any other tribe had hit 5k, etc.), etc.

I actually think it's a good thing for the health of the world though on a long-term basis, a fairly level playing field is a lot more fun.

This however I agree with. Would like to hear from the likes of T.E.A and T.L.H on here more tho :D
 

DeletedUser

Guest
we're around and about sgk :icon_wink: just reading and enjoying :lol:
 

Maggie Wallis

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
69
Agreed.

For a proper comparison, this is what average points per player looks like when a tribe that excels at startup is present looks like:

1. Pandas: 2,099
2. ~G*K~: 1,420
3. Fleeto: 1,325
4. PG: 1,264
5. NiBBLE: 1,213

Can't find earlier than that since Pandas didn't enter the top 20 till that point.

Here though no tribe really stands out in regards to early-game talent. There's no tribe that will be hitting the APP milestones before anyone else reaches the previous tier (meaning how Pandas was 1st to 10k points per player before any other tribe had hit 5k, etc.), etc.

I actually think it's a good thing for the health of the world though on a long-term basis, a fairly level playing field is a lot more fun.


Think Axes on W9 (or what ever they changed their name to at any one point) is the best example of a good start-up tribe nominating a world...

from the W9 forum:

Guys this is ridiculous

1 Axes! 8.284 8.284 20 414 20 414
2 Bandit 5.481 5.481 18 305 18 305

someone keep up?

Was a 20 member tribe limit so no chance of mass recruiting getting tribe to rank 1 early game....

From this point it just got worse and worse till most of them quit....
 
Last edited:

Nauzhror

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
106
Think Axes on W9 (or what ever they changed their name to at any one point) is the best example of a good start-up tribe nominating a world...

from the W9 forum:



Was a 20 member tribe limit so no chance of mass recruiting getting tribe to rank 1 early game....

From this point it just got worse and worse till most of them quit....

I would personally say this was far more dominating than that, fewer members, and on a world where mass recruiting was an option for the competition.

1 Pandas 281.824 281.824 14 20.130 58 4.859
2 PG 266.427 266.427 39 6.831 73 3.650
3 Fleeto 258.770 258.770 37 6.994 77 3.361
 
Top