Account Sitting

[Nauzhror]

What are the rules regarding account sitting here?

On .net it is illegal to sabotage an account you are sitting. On .de it is not illegal and if a sitter sabotages your account it is seen as your fault for misplacing your trust. Which of these is true here?

 

[DeletedUser269]

What are the rules regarding account sitting here?

On .net it is illegal to sabotage an account you are sitting. On .de it is not illegal and if a sitter sabotages your account it is seen as your fault for misplacing your trust. Which of these is true here?

This will help you answer that

Players and sitters are equally responsible for the actions of any sat account. Make sure you can trust the person you choose as sitter or whose account you are sitting. It is not allowed to abuse account sitting. Account sitters that intentionally destroy or seriously damage an account they are sitting will be punished.

 

[Nauzhror]

This will help you answer that

Damn Totally prefer the .de anything goes rules

 

[DeletedUser]

This will help you answer that

Cool thats preety cool and i agree on the fact whoever u send the sitting they do anythink wrong its your though in the first place

 

[DeletedUser]

Gah, that's annoying.

When people don't ask before setting you, they deserve to be trashed. :icon_rolleyes:

 

[DeletedUser269]

Gah, that's annoying.

When people don't ask before setting you, they deserve to be trashed. :icon_rolleyes:

Then don't accept it :icon_neutral: no need to be mean, and destroy someones work.

 

[Nauzhror]

But the .de method is so much fun. Get an account in an enemy tribe, rim their duke with it.

 

[DeletedUser]

But the .de method is so much fun. Get an account in an enemy tribe, rim their duke with it.

Agreed i think the rule should be it was your fault for passing to someone you dont trust, this would become very funny.

and as this is a war game why not?

Fury

 

[DeletedUser]

Then don't accept it :icon_neutral: no need to be mean, and destroy someones work.

It's more fun do destroy someones work. Plus they will never set you again.

 

[DeletedUser]

I'd say the rules are fair.

 

[DeletedUser]

Ah yeah, does that 'abuse account' rule cover the disbandment/dismissal of tribes? After all, it's not to the account itself...

 

[Nauzhror]

Ah yeah, does that 'abuse account' rule cover the disbandment/dismissal of tribes? After all, it's not to the account itself...

I'm assuming no. Worded the same on .net, but disbanding is plenty legal there.

 

[DeletedUser]

I'm assuming no. Worded the same on .net, but disbanding is plenty legal there.

Yeah. I'd hope/assume so too but it's best to make sure.