DeletedUser
Guest
This is awesome news.
As was said on the forum, UK likes to do things slightly different ~ UK10
DeletedUser4
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
First I accidentally close the tab somehow, then the power gets cut ... third time lucky :S
At the risk of sounding like a complete idiot:
What's the difference between advanced/non-advanced pally weapons?
What does the attack/support gap mean?
What does the 'outside support' setting mean?
Is fake limit 1% of points? I hate that setting :S
At the risk of sounding like a complete idiot:
What's the difference between advanced/non-advanced pally weapons?
What does the attack/support gap mean?
What does the 'outside support' setting mean?
Is fake limit 1% of points? I hate that setting :S
DeletedUser
Guest
Omg, like 8 friends are joining in because of the no chruch and no kata 1000% def item ^^
DeletedUser
Guest
At the risk of being wrong:
What's the difference between advanced/non-advanced pally weapons? Non-advanced has more modest effects. Most notably: no +900% bonfire.
What does the attack/support gap mean? Minimum time between commands.
What does the 'outside support' setting mean? Can only support tribesmates.
DeletedUser
Guest
Ah, thank you 
When were these advanced pally weapons introduced? I get the feeling I'm used to the normal ones, but I'm not sure.
When were these advanced pally weapons introduced? I get the feeling I'm used to the normal ones, but I'm not sure.
DeletedUser
Guest
Ah, thank you
When were these advanced pally weapons introduced? I get the feeling I'm used to the normal ones, but I'm not sure.
I don't know the exact date advanced was introduced, but you can see both the old and new styles here
DeletedUser
Guest
Ah, thanks. I think I'm used to old style ...
This world sounds fun, I'll give it a shot and fail miserably ;D
This world sounds fun, I'll give it a shot and fail miserably ;D
DeletedUser
Guest
PERFECT NEWS
DeletedUser
Guest
well i couldn't see the point of the bonfire here anyway, just stack the vill with 1000000 cats + bonfire and no one would ever get the vill
DeletedUser
Guest
What's a bonfi- HOLY- THAT'S A LOT OF CATTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
(I know what it is btw)
DeletedUser
Guest
Question: Why open a new World when W9 has only a few players?!
DeletedUser
Guest
The settings for uk10 are different then the settings for uk 9. Its not too fair to leave only one world open for people that don't like particular settings.
DeletedUser
Guest
I'm still half asleep and cannot contemplate the size of the title still.
But for those that are complaining about the settings, chill out? If you can't adapt to different settings and different playing styles then that's your own 'beef'. The rest of us like a challenge :icon_razz:
But for those that are complaining about the settings, chill out? If you can't adapt to different settings and different playing styles then that's your own 'beef'. The rest of us like a challenge :icon_razz:
DeletedUser
Guest
now adv pally weapons are removed I'll probably join. Church i dislike but can live with, bonus that it too is gone.
DeletedUser
Guest
I wish it didn't have a 10 Tech Smithy, I hate it :-D
I always forget to upgrade my troops...Other than that I'm in.
I always forget to upgrade my troops...Other than that I'm in.
DeletedUser
Guest
World 9 is a very slow world. Has taken several months for most people to get to nobles. .5 speed and barbs don't grow.
DeletedUser
Guest
The two points I find might give problems are:
Number of mega villages I see no difference to there being 9 (3 tribes with 3) or 10 (5 tribes with 2, going upto 2 tribes with 5) both could cause problems. 11 would be a better option or maybe 7.
Also the tribe lock.
In every world that has come out you get natural wastage its a fact of RL.
With small member limits with some leaving you could get a snowball effect that kills off a tribe.
I would think a rule in place that if the member count, points or villages fall below a certain level then the tribe can disband.
I also remember one problem player on W27 who killed a full tribe due to being voted duke & no one could leave. I realise this is slightly different in the settings but such a thing could spoil the world for many.
Also an update of the settings in the first post might not be a bad idea. I liked the original settings myself.
Number of mega villages I see no difference to there being 9 (3 tribes with 3) or 10 (5 tribes with 2, going upto 2 tribes with 5) both could cause problems. 11 would be a better option or maybe 7.
Also the tribe lock.
In every world that has come out you get natural wastage its a fact of RL.
With small member limits with some leaving you could get a snowball effect that kills off a tribe.
I would think a rule in place that if the member count, points or villages fall below a certain level then the tribe can disband.
I also remember one problem player on W27 who killed a full tribe due to being voted duke & no one could leave. I realise this is slightly different in the settings but such a thing could spoil the world for many.
Also an update of the settings in the first post might not be a bad idea. I liked the original settings myself.
DeletedUser
Guest
what about 2 with 3 and 1 with one or 3 with 3 and 1 with 2? still a problem.
