DeletedUser9748
Guest
Tell me gentlemen, you recruited RESIST refugees...so that makes you our...enemies? Is this a war I suppose? Should we sharpen our axes again?
Tell me gentlemen, you recruited RESIST refugees...so that makes you our...enemies? Is this a war I suppose? Should we sharpen our axes again?
Does this also show because he was the one that posted that Ballerond is now trying to run the show? esspecialy after col the dude one of the original members only posted to make sure the reply only went to mycool maybe its time for him to crack the wip
When a tribe declares war on another tribe and one of the tribes is losing, it's members who decide to flee and join another tribe for their own safety are considered refugees.
my 'safety' has never been in jeopardy (see previous mail)
If I am wrong correct me. You may not have received many attacks due to the distance or whatever other reason.
what was the reason?
You were on RESIST, who we were fighting, so joining an other tribe after many days of declaration (if you have stated that you do not wish to fight that war and want to play your own way, we would not have considered you refugee) means you are a refugee.
I hope I clarified that for you.
thank you for clarifying your interpretation of the word. Extending your own argument, you would agree then that you were a refugee when you 'fled' (your terminology) from KTHX to WC? What's good for the gander isn't good for the goose then?
And I don't believe the amount of fakes/nukes/nobles define how you were involved in this war or not.
You may not believe it, but the details in my previous post are entirely accurate, and are therefore perfectly relevant
Nobling inactives is not our problem since they have gone inactive. They were pretty much active some days ago before the declaration stating their awesomeness for clearing KTHX.
I can't comment on this really, other than to stick to facts by saying that they did clear KTHX. I find the game enjoyable enough in itself, so avoid the chest-thumping and the boasting, the twisted truths and insults, the over-inflated hype and general bad-will in these forums. I advise anyone finding themselves taking it all a bit too seriously to do the same.
I could suggest that conducting sensitive diplomacy publicly in the externals is neither appropriate nor acceptable, but that won't change the fact that that's what you're doing.
Naps are for babies...
Quote: Originally Posted by relentlessly pleasant
I could suggest that conducting sensitive diplomacy publicly in the externals is neither appropriate nor acceptable, but that won't change the fact that that's what you're doing.
^ Agreed. PMs people.