DeletedUser282
Guest
At a time when only they had nukes, therefore that is only a one sided nuclear war, had Japan had nukes as well then they would have nuked back as would america until they were both destroyed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
At a time when only they had nukes, therefore that is only a one sided nuclear war, had Japan had nukes as well then they would have nuked back as would america until they were both destroyed.
DeletedUser
Guest
I don't see how you can be FOR holding guns. The stats prove more deaths, and so what if you get mugged of what £100? Your not exactly gonna pull out a gun and shoot the idiot for £100? That would make you worse!
If everybody was level-headed, calm and logical a gun would be a safe precaution, but we're not, a lot of people are hot-headed, angry, violent people who can't always think straight with what we're doing.
If everybody was level-headed, calm and logical a gun would be a safe precaution, but we're not, a lot of people are hot-headed, angry, violent people who can't always think straight with what we're doing.
DeletedUser
Guest
At a time when only they had nukes, therefore that is only a one sided nuclear war, had Japan had nukes as well then they would have nuked back as would america until they were both destroyed.
Go make a nuke thread if you want to talk about that.
Share:
