Just back OMG disgusting

HardcoreHooligan

New Member
Reaction score
2
Just back playing and notice the disgusting rip-off price rise for PP, Innogames, you should be ashamed of yourselves, I hope this game dies and you lose your business elsewhere, what a bloody rip-off.
 

DeletedUser13859

Guest
A bit unfair, don't blame inno for everything. If you want someone to blame, then go after MTG. They bought 51% of inno back in the start of last year for €81 million so have to look somewhere to recuperate their massive investment. When they moved over it seems like an implemented 33% price rise. A bit much imo
 

DeletedUser4753

Guest
The history of pp price changes at the per month level (least as long as ive played)

pre April 2010 £3

April 2010
33% rise from £3 to £4, premium points changed from their single digit system to what we have now, sold to the community as compatibility unification process as tw entered eastern markets, but a opportune time to drop a 33% price hike

Jun 2013
27% drop £4 to £2.99, with the inclusion of micro-transactions in 2012, pp expenditure increase dramatically so despite a price drop, its not a transparent pass on of profits to consumers, not to mention the marketing advantage of squeezing addition pp purchases out of more money from those unable to shake the addictive nature of micro payments

Feb 2015
33% rise 2.99 to 3.99 , price hike, excuse was due to changes in tax law, seems inno enjoys its new found profits and will be putting any additional costs onto its consumers like a good company does.

Jan 17
25% rise £3.99 to £4.99, player numbers ever falling, player satisfaction surely has hit a low point, but cant have them profits dipping, time to bleed the remainder of its loyal community for all they got

In the mean time instead of addressing the plummeting player base, or the dissolution of older players based on ptw features, and lowering game quality, any money more than the bare minimum spent to maintain this perfect example of devs pissing on their customers is on a cheap nasty side game that wait.. you guessed it, is again designed to rinse flutter handed folk out of more money for some bonus that breaks the game further for those whom dont indulge.
 

HardcoreHooligan

New Member
Reaction score
2
A bit unfair, don't blame inno for everything. If you want someone to blame, then go after MTG. They bought 51% of inno back in the start of last year for €81 million so have to look somewhere to recuperate their massive investment. When they moved over it seems like an implemented 33% price rise. A bit much imo

Thanks for the info mate, I never knew that unfortunately, the price rise is well over the odds and things like that have ruined the game IMHO
 

HardcoreHooligan

New Member
Reaction score
2
The history of pp price changes at the per month level (least as long as ive played)

pre April 2010 £3

April 2010
33% rise from £3 to £4, premium points changed from their single digit system to what we have now, sold to the community as compatibility unification process as tw entered eastern markets, but a opportune time to drop a 33% price hike

Jun 2013
27% drop £4 to £2.99, with the inclusion of micro-transactions in 2012, pp expenditure increase dramatically so despite a price drop, its not a transparent pass on of profits to consumers, not to mention the marketing advantage of squeezing addition pp purchases out of more money from those unable to shake the addictive nature of micro payments

Feb 2015
33% rise 2.99 to 3.99 , price hike, excuse was due to changes in tax law, seems inno enjoys its new found profits and will be putting any additional costs onto its consumers like a good company does.

Jan 17
25% rise £3.99 to £4.99, player numbers ever falling, player satisfaction surely has hit a low point, but cant have them profits dipping, time to bleed the remainder of its loyal community for all they got

In the mean time instead of addressing the plummeting player base, or the dissolution of older players based on ptw features, and lowering game quality, any money more than the bare minimum spent to maintain this perfect example of devs pissing on their customers is on a cheap nasty side game that wait.. you guessed it, is again designed to rinse flutter handed folk out of more money for some bonus that breaks the game further for those whom dont indulge.

I totally resonate with your reply mate, cheers.
 
Top