T4H declare on F.P.B

DeletedUser2961

Guest
krillinentropy said:
Like there is villages now belonging to w1n deep in are areas which where cows members, now there not aloud to be attacked. Like would it be fair for us to recruit load of Lrag so you cant attack them untill 3rd sept?
Not that we will :)
Click to expand...

Every one would be a refugee, and I for one would not stop attacking - Hmm, ask Lrag what happens when you recruit refugees and losers.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
gypsyvixcent said:
Every one would be a refugee, and I for one would not stop attacking - Hmm, ask Lrag what happens when you recruit refugees and losers.
Click to expand...

just throwing this out there altho i am going to expect some sort of critism but does this not apply to those who were in F.P.B/CoWs also? classed as refugees of war?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I'm not sure that the two can really be compared. LRAG barely seem to understand how to fight back. The COWs, and before them FPB, do appear to do something of the sort. ;)

(Kudos for defensive skills, LRAG, but we all know that's just prolonging the inevitable.... and not even prolonging it by much anymore)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
seanyboi said:
just throwing this out there altho i am going to expect some sort of critism but does this not apply to those who were in F.P.B/CoWs also? classed as refugees of war?
Click to expand...



I think the point would be that we have been at war with FPB/Cows and all it's antecedents for almost two years, much longer than T4H have - in fact I believe that during the time we were at war with FPB/Cows, T4H were allied with said tribe and FPB/Cows were trying to get T4H to join them in their war with us, until they had their all little fallout which we shan't go in to. I apologise if I'm incorrect, the grapevine can be notoriously inaccurate, although those details were taken from the W1N/T4H joint chat.

So if we choose to recruit members from our oldest enemy, that is slightly different than if T4H choose to recruit people that we have been at war with for a year (at least) longer than they have and are actively knocking seven bells out of.

I believe that earlier Patsy make have given a bit of an inkling that T4H intend to recruit from LRAG (Border agreements not withstanding). In my honest opinion this would not be a good move for T4H. Aside from the mullering that the stats would take, and we all love a good stat, the outcry for defence to be supplied by T4H to their new vassals would be immense, and one which would not be worth the bother. It would be like the whole WET/BCW debacle all over again (one for all you old schoolers!)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Delta said:
I think the point would be that we have been at war with FPB/Cows and all it's antecedents for almost two years, much longer than T4H have - in fact I believe that during the time we were at war with FPB/Cows, T4H were allied with said tribe and FPB/Cows were trying to get T4H to join them in their war with us, until they had their all little fallout which we shan't go in to. I apologise if I'm incorrect, the grapevine can be notoriously inaccurate, although those details were taken from the W1N/T4H joint chat.

So if we choose to recruit members from our oldest enemy, that is slightly different than if T4H choose to recruit people that we have been at war with for a year (at least) longer than they have and are actively knocking seven bells out of.

I believe that earlier Patsy make have given a bit of an inkling that T4H intend to recruit from LRAG (Border agreements not withstanding). In my honest opinion this would not be a good move for T4H. Aside from the mullering that the stats would take, and we all love a good stat, the outcry for defence to be supplied by T4H to their new vassals would be immense, and one which would not be worth the bother. It would be like the whole WET/BCW debacle all over again (one for all you old schoolers!)
Click to expand...

i believe that is incorrect as T4H was warring with exp-F.P.B-CoWs around same period of time because if memory serves me correct CHE!!! declared on EXP during the whole WET merger then very next day T4H declared due to EXP making TEA an academy tribe of theirs thus making the war practicly same period of time due to W1N being allied with EXP and CHE!!! roughly then once CHE!!! merged into W1N that is when W1N began war with EXP as i remember the whole CHE!!! and EXP trying to get W1N to work along side with ither of the tribes when W1N decided to sit out for time being.
but as i said i was expecting critisism on this part but honestly when you said that F.P.B/CoWs/EXP do something of the sort in perspectve of the war i would honestly say they arent much better then LRAG but thats my opinion :)

i highly doubt patsy was being serious about recruiting them T4H arent that dumb to recruit a deadweight tribe :) *cough* orc/lrag *cough*

and yes i remember the WET and BCW thing haha all went down hill when hotfusion left but thats the history haha
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser4479

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: T4H
Side 2:
Tribes: CoWs

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 2,841
Side 2: 1,223
Difference: 1,618

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 170
Side 2: 25
Difference: 145

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 19,821,125
Side 2: 10,733,889
Difference: 9,087,236

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,607,106
Side 2: 232,482
Difference: 1,374,624

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
seanyboi said:
i believe that is incorrect as T4H was warring with exp-F.P.B-CoWs around same period of time because if memory serves me correct CHE!!! declared on EXP during the whole WET merger then very next day T4H declared due to EXP making TEA an academy tribe of theirs thus making the war practicly same period of time due to W1N being allied with EXP and CHE!!! roughly then once CHE!!! merged into W1N that is when W1N began war with EXP as i remember the whole CHE!!! and EXP trying to get W1N to work along side with ither of the tribes when W1N decided to sit out for time being.
but as i said i was expecting critisism on this part but honestly when you said that F.P.B/CoWs/EXP do something of the sort in perspectve of the war i would honestly say they arent much better then LRAG but thats my opinion :)

i highly doubt patsy was being serious about recruiting them T4H arent that dumb to recruit a deadweight tribe :) *cough* orc/lrag *cough*

and yes i remember the WET and BCW thing haha all went down hill when hotfusion left but thats the history haha
Click to expand...



T4H and FPB entered into an alliance in order to remove FW from the world. They both recruited, and watched some join IWL, so hard to gauge the result.
 

DeletedUser4479

Guest
gypsyvixcent said:
Every one would be a refugee, and I for one would not stop attacking - Hmm, ask Lrag what happens when you recruit refugees and losers.
Click to expand...

Note that w1n have recruited players with villages deep into T4H ground not stopped you guys lol. We may not win this war but it will not stop us trying and it could happen, but least where fighting with Honor
And no we will not recruit Lrag lol Where not that cheap.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Well, to begin with W1N handed over the villes or kicked the play in question, however once we looked at the Jenko into account......

TBH We didn't anticipate the in roads that Cows had made into you. And don't blame you on the LRAG front.
 

DeletedUser4479

Guest
Roads that cows have made into us Oo am you mean the villages left behide while we swarm deeping into there k's
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Krillin, a few T4H haven't just not played by the rules, they've flaunted them. So before anyone gets on their high horse (pun intended) about honour and integrity I'd look a little closer to home first, as Delta suggested.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Delta said:
I believe that earlier Patsy make have given a bit of an inkling that T4H intend to recruit from LRAG (Border agreements not withstanding). In my honest opinion this would not be a good move for T4H. )
Click to expand...
I think you have miss quoted me, please provide the quote where I said this!

So if we choose to recruit members from our oldest enemy, that is slightly different than if T4H choose to recruit people that we have been at war with for a year (at least) longer than they have and are actively knocking seven bells out of
Click to expand...

If my memory is correct we were also kicking seven bells out of them
and there was not even a post in the F.P.B/W1N PNP for nearly a year

http://forum.tribalwars.co.uk/showthread.php?t=10951
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Delta said:
Well, to begin with W1N handed over the villes or kicked the play in question, however once we looked at the Jenko into account......

TBH We didn't anticipate the in roads that Cows had made into you. And don't blame you on the LRAG front.
Click to expand...

Meaning
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Post by Luke Bishop
I font get why you are so upset about the war? It's been agreed for ages. We aren't getting angry over your recruitment attempts of COWS, TB and discussions with LRAG, we accept it's part of the game and That your council want to win. Can't we all be nice about it!
Click to expand...

Following Lukes post had decided not to make any further posts because I had made some good friends in W1N.

Not sure why people are making posts now - but if people wish to continue then so will we.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Some of us are less sensitive about it than others.

The war the world's been waiting for...it's going to be fun :icon_biggrin:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Reef said:
Some of us are less sensitive about it than others.

The war the world's been waiting for...it's going to be fun :icon_biggrin:
Click to expand...

I agree friends killing friends ,so many of our cousins across the pond are looking for accounts claiming they have years of experience at this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top