UDA Invited To Queen's Ceremony

[DeletedUser]

Here it is.

The question on everybody’s lips in coming days will be “are the top brass of the UDA going to get a chance to shake hands with the Queen on her trip to the Republic of Ireland?” The UDA’s five brigadiers and 4/5 representatives of their respective districts have been extended invitations to a wreath laying ceremony by Queen Elizabeth at Islandbridge in honour of the war dead.

For those not familiar with the UDA, here's some background reading for you. They're a designated terrorist group in the UK, US and Ireland. Seems surprising that the royal family wouldn't have a problem with them showing up; nor the Irish President, who invited them.

Coming up next: IRA hired as contractor for handling security during the Quuen's visit.

 

[DeletedUser]

Of course you are not familiar with the UDA either. The UDA were formed for the Defense against the Republic violence, and hence why they worked alongside the British Government. Some did wrong and mudered civilians, but they committed less deaths on the Catholic people than the IRA committed to their own. They have since disarmed and kept to that even though the IRA are bombing police and civilians yet again.

One must also remember that the IRA are suspected to attempt an attack on Her Majesty, and have been seen scouting and filming her route.

 

[DeletedUser]

Of course you are not familiar with the UDA either. The UDA were formed for the Defense against the Republic violence, and hence why they worked alongside the British Government. Some did wrong and mudered civilians, but they committed less deaths on the Catholic people than the IRA committed to their own. They have since disarmed and kept to that even though the IRA are bombing police and civilians yet again.

One must also remember that the IRA are suspected to attempt an attack on Her Majesty, and have been seen scouting and filming her route.

Consequences will never be the same.

 

[DeletedUser613]

Of course you are not familiar with the UDA either. The UDA were formed for the Defense against the Republic violence, and hence why they worked alongside the British Government. Some did wrong and mudered civilians, but they committed less deaths on the Catholic people than the IRA committed to their own. They have since disarmed and kept to that even though the IRA are bombing police and civilians yet again.

One must also remember that the IRA are suspected to attempt an attack on Her Majesty, and have been seen scouting and filming her route.

:lol: The UDA specifically targeted random catholic civilians. not some did wrong but that was actually their main objective, murdering civilians. The IRA would usually target police or army and bombs usually had warnings attached so civilians were evacuated, of course this did not always happen but their objective wasnt to kill civilians unlike the UDA.

The IRA have also decommissioned get your facts right. The current bombings are being undetaken by a very small breakaway group of dissidents.

 

[DeletedUser]

A splinter group? Yes. Are they called the IRA? Yes. The main objective of the UDA wasn't to kill civilians. Their objective was to ensure Northern Ireland was not taken over by terrorist scum.

The IRA killed far Catholic civilians that the British and loyalists! Yes the IRA gave warnings, but with the amount of fake warnings they gave out you'd bloody question their reliability.

 

[DeletedUser613]

A splinter group? Yes. Are they called the IRA? Yes. The main objective of the UDA wasn't to kill civilians. Their objective was to ensure Northern Ireland was not taken over by terrorist scum.

The IRA killed far Catholic civilians that the British and loyalists! Yes the IRA gave warnings, but with the amount of fake warnings they gave out you'd bloody question their reliability.

They are not the ira of the troubles, they probably have about 50 members max and its not like they have been very successful.
:lol: they are terrorist scum. And just how would you ensure that by driving round in cars shooting random civilians.

No they didn't. The UDA also killed protestants, although as they were actually going round shooting in catholic areas it was alot harder for them to kill protestants while the ira usually bombed areas when even with the warning it was inevitable some catholics may be near.
The UVF and the UDA had about 80% of the people they killed who were civilians and a tiny % of actual ira members.

 

[DeletedUser]

Of course you are not familiar with the UDA either. The UDA were formed for the Defense against the Republic violence, and hence why they worked alongside the British Government. Some did wrong and mudered civilians, but they committed less deaths on the Catholic people than the IRA committed to their own. They have since disarmed and kept to that even though the IRA are bombing police and civilians yet again.

One must also remember that the IRA are suspected to attempt an attack on Her Majesty, and have been seen scouting and filming her route.

Wow :lol: you took that bait like a fish.

And are you seriously trying to justify one terrorist organisation over the other?

A splinter group? Yes. Are they called the IRA? Yes. The main objective of the UDA wasn't to kill civilians. Their objective was to ensure Northern Ireland was not taken over by terrorist scum.

Who cares what their supposed main objective was. They used intimidation, indiscreet murder and homicide in an attempt to achieve their goals. In the process they became the terrorists themselves, murdered civilians and caused collateral damage by bombing. Well played. Scared the IRA right off the island they did.

 

[DeletedUser]

Now now, both sides were complete scumbags, let's not try and defend on or the other.

Rizzler.

 

[DeletedUser613]

yes cougar?

 

[DeletedUser]

Stop bumming the IRA.

 

[DeletedUser613]

Not defending ira, UDA/UVF were worse though.