Really? i don't recall, maybe because I've never been in Bi!
So Bi! would obviously speak well of you.
The same could be said of W A R, if you went and asked any of them if they thought i was a good player, or a good leader. I would hope they would say yes, if they say no, I would step down.
Ignorance again is subjective labeling someone as "Ignorant" is useless as they are obviously not ignorant about everything. Generalisations are not helpful.
As the former duke of Bi!, I can say without a doubt that Frank Lucas was a good player. Olis, your stats speak of themselves, I don't need your leaders to tell me how awesome you are (or not, as the case may be).
What's the highest rank you've ever attained? In points? OD? ODA? Are you a name people fear? Are you well-connected?
Are you (dare I say it) (in)famous?
Those that score highly on the above mentioned are signs of a good player. You have to be prove yourself. Therefore people contest your opinion so much; you don't have the credentials to make such controversial and argumentative statements.
You will undoubtedly argue free speech and all that human rights jargon. Free speech does not give you the right to shout over your superiors. Its like a layman trying to argue with a doctor on a medical related issue. The layman insists his opinion is of the same value as the doctor, as anything less would be against free speech and human rights.
I'm sorry to say but I'd consider the doctor's opinion to be far more valuable than the layman's. In the same way, players better than you are arguing against you, and you are continuing to argue against superior forces and numbers. You have to gain credentials before you can argue against better players and have weight in your opinion.
Until then, if you post anything controversial, you will find heavy opposition to your posts. Also, try changing the style of how you write to something less abrasive until you can get away with it without getting flamed.
