DeletedUser
Guest
***T4H vs. FW***
DeletedUser
Guest
[clt]No more grammar bashing, off topic, spamming... you have been warned[/clt]
DeletedUser
Guest
Whoops! Sorry CLF
On topic, KA and AK are presently fighting;
LRAG & LRAGFO
FREE
W1N
Here is the stats for the last week or so.
Side 1:
Tribes: W1N. W1N LRAG LRAGFO FREE
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: KA AK
Players:
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 19
Side 2: 39
Difference: 20
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 122,840
Side 2: 254,410
Difference: 131,570
To clarify, yes we're beating, or matching each enemy for villages in the last week.
On topic, KA and AK are presently fighting;
LRAG & LRAGFO
FREE
W1N
Here is the stats for the last week or so.
Side 1:
Tribes: W1N. W1N LRAG LRAGFO FREE
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: KA AK
Players:
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 19
Side 2: 39
Difference: 20
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 122,840
Side 2: 254,410
Difference: 131,570
To clarify, yes we're beating, or matching each enemy for villages in the last week.
DeletedUser
Guest
A top 20 war.
Lower tribed wars refers to outside the top 30, some say top 20. Get your points right.
Oh and marekchiel, no point showing the stats together as that would give the impression of co-ordination between the tribes.
Lower tribed wars refers to outside the top 30, some say top 20. Get your points right.
Oh and marekchiel, no point showing the stats together as that would give the impression of co-ordination between the tribes.
DeletedUser
Guest
:S I don't think this is meant for lower tribes (not to exclude them) I just thought it was current wars.
Sorry for showing the stats together, was just feeling lazy and wished to demonstrate we were winning our wars at the moment. However if you wish;
Lrag & LRAGFO
Side 1:
Tribes: LRAG LRAGFO
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: AK KA
Players:
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 3
Side 2: 5
Difference: 2
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 27,679
Side 2: 33,051
Difference: 5,372
W1N & W1N. (I don't think W1N. have nobled any villages from us, vice versa)
Side 1:
Tribes: W1N. W1N
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: AK KA
Players:
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 3
Side 2: 3
Difference: 0
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 16,466
Side 2: 32,621
Difference: 16,155
Finally Free our main focus
Side 1:
Tribes: FREE
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: AK KA
Players:
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 13
Side 2: 30
Difference: 17
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 78,695
Side 2: 181,682
Difference: 102,987
As you can see we're not in too much conflict at the moment, espeacially against W1N. However, fighting (Free in particular) has been a lot of fun for all of us.
How's that onion?
DeletedUser
Guest
Better thank you 
DeletedUser
Guest
Which way do you want it? We've got W1N posting figures as tho its a 'coalition' and we've got other tribes asking for them 1 vs 1. If you wanna see the stats go and find em yourself. People should be sending nukes not pandering to stat requests, yourself included onion.
DeletedUser
Guest
Timmy I didn't want to see the stats, if you understood my comment you would see I only wanted the stats seperated as it may give the impression that W1N, FREE and ourselves are working together.
DeletedUser
Guest
you guys did bring it on in a cheesey way from what i saw (i may not have the complete picture, im sure you'll like to disagree)
i mean you coordinated an attack against a guy alone in K83/93, two continents away from the rest of the tribe, sent in 500 incomings, and still played stupid on the shared forums, made me lol... ow and stacked villages on the frontline beforehand!!
but good luck to both sides,
i myself, unfortunetly, am on the other side near Chaos!
hopefully this can spice the world up a bit (maybe W1N or TR can get involved as well)
DeletedUser
Guest
p.s. all you other guys, could you please stop talking about what a top tribe war is? and maybe discuss the ones that are taking place?
its getting boring :icon_redface:
its getting boring :icon_redface:
DeletedUser
Guest
Oh Dear... You doubt *FW*'s ability to win this fight alone, after just one day? :lol:
DeletedUser
Guest
no i dont doubt it, i just think this world needs more wars been "top" tribes,
why the patronising tone? are YOU scared? do you not want anyone else to get involved? too scared of the other two bordering tribes and dont think T4H would be able to handle a war on two fronts?
why the patronising tone? are YOU scared? do you not want anyone else to get involved? too scared of the other two bordering tribes and dont think T4H would be able to handle a war on two fronts?
DeletedUser1942
Guest
The world is spicing up nicely i reckon, fair few wars breaking out now in the south, east and north. The west seems to have fallen asleep though!!
I wouldnt hold any hope for TR jumping in to assist you though against T4H - unless T4H all turn barb, it just wont happen
DeletedUser
Guest
are there no wars in the west?
are TR at war with ORC?
are TR at war with anyone?
are W1N fighting anyone on their western side?
i know, thats a lot of quesiton, but i thought atleast ORC and TR would be fighting somewhere
are TR at war with ORC?
are TR at war with anyone?
are W1N fighting anyone on their western side?
i know, thats a lot of quesiton, but i thought atleast ORC and TR would be fighting somewhere
DeletedUser1942
Guest
Nope, i dont think anything is happening to the west, if it is, its bypassing me lol
TR + ORC = Hugz
TR + war = BIG no no (barbs are more fun apparently)
W1N + fighting on the west = not at present
So it seems it is boring over here
DeletedUser
Guest
tbh, i did expect TR to be at war with someone, their rank 2 and 6 and 14... what do their leaders say?
DeletedUser
Guest
lets hug ?
DeletedUser1942
Guest
Theres 3 tribes that they can have a proper war with - W1N, ORC or T4H.
W1N - Been goading TR to declare, with no luck as yet, not sure why they havent decided to just go for it
ORC - Proven themselves against W1N, probably putting TR off going for them, as they are fully functioning, and the council probably wont jump ship.
T4H - Started warring recently, TR wont jump in unless T4H are defenseless(if that happens).
2 of the 3 tribes have diplomatic relations with TR.
It seems TR are very happy barb nobling, and not keen to war any sort of tribe that is in a good position to defend itself. How dull
W1N - Been goading TR to declare, with no luck as yet, not sure why they havent decided to just go for it
ORC - Proven themselves against W1N, probably putting TR off going for them, as they are fully functioning, and the council probably wont jump ship.
T4H - Started warring recently, TR wont jump in unless T4H are defenseless(if that happens).
2 of the 3 tribes have diplomatic relations with TR.
It seems TR are very happy barb nobling, and not keen to war any sort of tribe that is in a good position to defend itself. How dull
DeletedUser4320
Guest
Why don't W1N declare themselves? Seems like an oxymoron to complain about another tribe not declaring on you.
Or is it an example of talking the talk, but not walking the walk as the saying goes?
DeletedUser1942
Guest
As Roch said on another thread Dubby, W1N have no need to declare as there are wars elsewhere with the coalition, therefore it would be fantastic for TR to man up and stop there barb hunting quest. Why would they sit back and wait for the war to come to them - maybe they are waiting for the coalition to do W1N some sort of damage first, and then jump in when W1N may be weak?(as they did with KN and Swarm)
