DeletedUser1728
Guest
I know specific bans are not allowed to be discussed on the forum, however events today and an afternoon of head bashing, I feel there does need to be a clarification of part of the account sitting/sharing IP rules.
So Rule 3 paragraph I states "Article 2, paragraphs II. and III., must be adhered to, as if the accounts in question were sharing a connection."
Specifically rule 2 paragraph 2 states "No transfer of resources, coordinated attacks, support or attacks on each other or to the same player are permitted whilst connection sharing is in place and for 24 hours after it is ended or 48 hours after the last attack that was sent on the same connection has arrived."
It sounds quite simple; you pick up an account sit and are physically not allowed to co-ordinate for 24 hours anyway by the game.
You can attack the same player from the 2 accounts though once you have the sit provided the last attack from the first account launched has landed at least 48 hours previously.
However, when you read that rule it does imply that this sort of coordination is applicable from when you started an account sit/shared ip but not to attacks that happened before the sharing began.
From today's events, it is apparent that this is not the case.
If launching BEFORE accepting an account sit and then launching again from a sit is a breach of the rule, then the rule should be written in a way that makes that point clear.
So Rule 3 paragraph I states "Article 2, paragraphs II. and III., must be adhered to, as if the accounts in question were sharing a connection."
Specifically rule 2 paragraph 2 states "No transfer of resources, coordinated attacks, support or attacks on each other or to the same player are permitted whilst connection sharing is in place and for 24 hours after it is ended or 48 hours after the last attack that was sent on the same connection has arrived."
It sounds quite simple; you pick up an account sit and are physically not allowed to co-ordinate for 24 hours anyway by the game.
You can attack the same player from the 2 accounts though once you have the sit provided the last attack from the first account launched has landed at least 48 hours previously.
However, when you read that rule it does imply that this sort of coordination is applicable from when you started an account sit/shared ip but not to attacks that happened before the sharing began.
From today's events, it is apparent that this is not the case.
If launching BEFORE accepting an account sit and then launching again from a sit is a breach of the rule, then the rule should be written in a way that makes that point clear.