DeletedUser9129
Guest
He nobled the crummy village because he wanted to be the first to noble a village. I know personally that he is not a noob/barb nobler... Just a .. milestone whore
That might be but I think the point most are making is no one classes it as a milestone because they nobled a barb regardless how they have and do play the game its still not that great an achievement. Im sure someone else could of probably nobled a barb before they did but chose to wait for a train or decent target.....anyway just my opinion and its still better than I have done.
I'm not sure why people complain about this every world. >.>
What's wrong with nobling barbs? Too easy? So I suppose nobling a noob who has 3k points also should also be frowned upon because its too easy. Maybe nobling a pure offensive player is too easy as well, as they can not defend themselves. Also not nobling someone while they're offline, but waiting until they come online? Prehaps we shouldn't noble anyone outside top twenty to make sure we don't get an easy conquer?
There's nothing wrong with going against the status quo. People need to stop hopping on the band wagon without realizing nobling small villages can have their advantages. I personally never noble small/barb villages, but that doesn't mean I find something wrong with the tactic - People have done well countless times doing it.
I never said there was anything wrong with it I said I am sure thats the way people look at it and as I said still better than I have done so far.......It can be a very good tactic for a first noble as you dont have any troop casulties so there is no rebuilding involved, its just not something I would do purely because I am too lazy/impatient and I hate building my first villa up from scratch never mind a second or third.
I'm not sure why people complain about this every world. >.>
What's wrong with nobling barbs? Too easy? So I suppose nobling a noob who has 3k points also should also be frowned upon because its too easy. Maybe nobling a pure offensive player is too easy as well, as they can not defend themselves. Also not nobling someone while they're offline, but waiting until they come online? Prehaps we shouldn't noble anyone outside top twenty to make sure we don't get an easy conquer?
There's nothing wrong with going against the status quo. People need to stop hopping on the band wagon without realizing nobling small villages can have their advantages. I personally never noble small/barb villages, but that doesn't mean I find something wrong with the tactic - People have done well countless times doing it.
I REFUSE TO STRAIN MY EYES READING THIS RIDICULOUS COLOUR AND FONT,
perhaps you could increase its size or make it bold if you insist on using it
EXAMPLE
I REFUSE TO STRAIN MY EYES READING THIS RIDICULOUS COLOUR AND FONT,
perhaps you could increase its size or make it bold if you insist on using it
EXAMPLE
Why are you representing .uk as game staff if you resort to rash behavior like that?
HOW ABOUT YOU GET SOME GLASSES? See? It's a fairly ignorant outcry.
If memory serves LOB did this on W7, milestone whore methinks?
If memory serves LOB did this on W7, milestone whore methinks?
Correct! and i do think that was also wood bonus lolol
Correct! but that was because that was my best option, in UK8 I have nobled 2 active villages first, because that was my best option.
________________
Come on now that was not your best option and the only reason you probably nobled a player this time is because of the flaming you got on UK7
It wasn't directed at you; just people posting in this thread that the person doesn't deserve the milestone.