DeletedUser
Guest
I might consider teaching if ade is one of my students :lol:
True... But I doubt i can set up a website, but main noobs will be recruited IG.
The other thing that bugged me is the absurd idea that a teaching tribe should not chase the rankings.
I think the opposite, the idea that a player should be playing badly, because they are "teaching" people makes sense.
Lead by example, even teaching tribes can be competitive. There is not one reason why they shouldnt be...
wardyuc said:plays who dont sit since they dont get sat
In all honesty i think there is a difference between sitting people and partly playing their account for them.That doesn't actually bother me. I don't use sitters, and don't sit other people either. Point of the game for me is to have fun. Playing one account is already somewhat akin to a job. Playing two or three is more work than my job. When sitting people regularly the game is no longer fun for me, and if the game is not going to be fun, I would rather not be playing it at all. Very much my belief that if you don't have the the capability to play your own account without needing sitters (should be noted I mean on a nightly basis, I'm more than willing to sit and split a train, or do something on an irregular basis) then you should either do as best as you can solo even if that isn't very good, or you should co-play, both options are far more polite to the tribe than expecting someone else to play your account every night in addition to their own.
If someone is going away for 3 days i may help sit them, but even then i will do the bare minimum of farming, as well as try to keep their account from getting rimmed. That is what sitting is for me.
Sorry NYK I'm going to be passing on UK 7.
Probably not ;(