ODA or ODD?

[DeletedUser8409]

What takes more skill?

There are both great attackers and defenders on TW and a lucky few who excel at both

[02:31:41] Abdo: but end of the day, done properly, ODD is > ODA

So what takes more skill? And which is better?

ODA is not hard to make..... u just need attack troops and to attack.... if u use full attacks and studie a bit of oponent its easy...

ODD its more like it.... but.... if u have a good tribe that support u its easy to make it alsoo if u get attacked ofcourse....


but.....

a good player can have a very high ODA because attack a lot and need to know how to attack

a good player can have a good ODD because he makes a lot of troops because he cant be online all the time to snipe the nobles

but a really good player..... dont need to be top 1 in ODA or ODD

a very good player ( and active ) knows how to attack and conquear loosing few army
a very good player ( and active ) knows how to snipe nobles or deffend only the right villages

OD doesent make a good player, its the good player that makes his OD

You know you are talking about recaping and that not that useful if you loose all the troops that were in that village is it. :icon_neutral:

its allways poossible to use the attack troops from that vill attacking a close enemy vill from who is attacking u.

like that u kill some enemy troops before u loose the village....
ur enemy loose 4 noblesman by nobling ur vill at leat 4 times and loose his all troops by attacking him self and still loose the vill right after he conquer ( dont even have time to see it )

this way should be the last to use but.... its good to use when u know u will not make it to keep the vill

better to loose 1 vill trops ( that u have time to use ) as loosing the deff of 3 or 4 vill trying to save it and loosing the vill