stats dont lie

DeletedUser

Guest
exp is getting slaughtered, outright butchered by che, here are just a few stats.

Side 1:
Tribes: CHE!!!
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: EXP
Players:

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 28
Side 2: 6
Difference: 22

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 249,887
Side 2: 58,673
Difference: 191,214

image.php


and over 100 village difference in the past month as you can CLEARLY see here.

Side 1:
Tribes: CHE!!!
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: EXP
Players:

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 156
Side 2: 32
Difference: 124

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,329,412
Side 2: 291,642
Difference: 1,037,770

image.php
 

DeletedUser6323

Guest
lol, I love how the loss of 28 villages is considered getting 'slaughtered and outright butchered'. It seems like such a childish ploy. 'Oh look! They've lost a few more villages so they must be getting hammered on!' But yet, the taking of inactive villages is not counted here, not to mention that it's still early days yet. There is that saying, 'Slow and steady wins the race...'. And in this case, CHE are the hares, and EXP the tortoise's. Sure you may start off with a bang, but when it comes down to it, we all know how that story ends :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Stats don't neccessarily lie but everyone knows they can be tweaked
Lets see how Marney24 one of CHE!!!'s "elite" barons is doing against poor defenseless EXP/EXT shall we?

Side 1:
Tribes:
Players: marney24

Side 2:
Tribes: EXP EXT
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 3
Side 2: 17
Difference: 14

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 29,746
Side 2: 171,573
Difference: 141,827

image.php
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes:
Players: marney24

Side 2:
Tribes: EXP EXT
Players:

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1
Side 2: 8
Difference: 7

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 9,707
Side 2: 79,215
Difference: 69,508

image.php


^^^ LAST 48 HOURS
 

DeletedUser

Guest
And LAST 24 HOURS:
Side 1:
Tribes:
Players: marney24

Side 2:
Tribes: EXP EXT
Players:

Timeframe: Last 24 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 5
Difference: 5

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 49,737
Difference: 49,737

image.php



I thought he was stacked??
Obviously not
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Yes. Because a single player can make or break a tribe. I'm sure CHE!!! will lose due to the simple fact that despite EXP is losing more villages a day then they can take, they're still nobling a CHE!!! player and are therefore invincible.../sarcasm
 

DeletedUser

Guest
One player? Wooh? 2 tribes managed to form one operation and take 17 Villages from the last week? :icon_redface: I'd be embarrassed.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Artemis the Archer. Are you really trying to compare some of those gains to the 120 net gain CHE!!! has taken from EXP? They have conquered over 1% of the tribe in less than two weeks. The fact that there is not a full sharing of borders means that that is no small amount. The fact that the majority of EXP can rely on geographical safety makes those minority losing so much no insignificant amount.

I would also suggest that EXP are in a lot more trouble than the seem, though an argument very few seem to be considering. 120 villages in the first two wars is very big. Offense recruits faster than defence, and in anticipation of war, stacking from both sides absorb losses. However, 120 villages have been taken. This leads to a few possible conclusions:

- Stacking did not happen. Reprecussions for the leaders? Or is it already happening? Possible growth of instablity?
- What stacking that has happened has been torn apart. Looking at increased losses here.
- Bad performance by EXP, badly organised and just haven't been properly tested.
- Good performance by CHE!!!, better organised, more efficient.
- A mixture of all or some of the above.

All of which spells danger for EXP. Improve or die, improve or die. But it's very hard to improve during war, all of which spells bad news for EXP.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
I think its pretty shameful that EXP are showing stats for one player whilst CHE!!! show stats against their whole tribe indicating pure domination. If EXP expect to improve they need to set their standards much higher than this.

Timmyhill

p.s. Good to see you back in CHE!!! rob - home is where the heart is and all that.
 

DeletedUser1189

Guest
Marney is not a baron nor has he ever been.

Also, although its easy for you guys to troll a player who is surrounded by EXP members and being gang banged by several people nuking him, although a minor show for your stats, when you look at the overall status since war began, and include all the people you kicked out who are still fighting, we have taken more than two million points in a short time. Enjoy your trolling and stat showing as you gang bang an isolated player and only show them stats. Desperate really.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
roch2001 said:
Marney is not a baron nor has he ever been.

Also, although its easy for you guys to troll a player who is surrounded by EXP members and being gang banged by several people nuking him, although a minor show for your stats, when you look at the overall status since war began, and include all the people you kicked out who are still fighting, we have taken more than two million points in a short time. Enjoy your trolling and stat showing as you gang bang an isolated player and only show them stats. Desperate really.
Click to expand...


Oh come on roch2001 poor Marney may of liked the idea of being classed a baron and before he can get to like the thought you rip him of the fame :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
roch2001 said:
Marney is not a baron nor has he ever been.
Click to expand...

Seriously?
:icon_rolleyes:

Thats funny cos he said he was

Oh this is funny really it is

Marney isn't a baron?

I didn't think ye were totally looney
I kinda hoped ye were
But honestly didn't think you'd be that stupid

Glad to have that cleared up anyway :lol:
 

DeletedUser1189

Guest
Maybe if he was telling you that it was when we were all barons, we tried it out sometime, had a socialist revolution in the tribe. Ah, was fun times.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Ill give you a few more stats

Side 1:
Tribes: EXP EXT
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: G.G I.G *FW* *WW* Riffs =T4H= T4H-W CHE!!!
Players:

Timeframe: Last 3 months

Total conquers:

Side 1: 8,291
Side 2: 13,374
Difference: 5,083

image.php
 

DeletedUser6323

Guest
He's perhaps saying that it's one tribe or rather a family tribe, against 8 other tribes. And having those many wars on the go, EXP/T aren't doing as badly as everyone thinks. They're holding their own pretty good. 8k ennoblements against 8 tribes vs 13k ennoblements from 8 different tribes trying to noble the same one.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
It proves the original post is extremely stupid, how can be be getting slaughtered?

We have 8 Active wars compared to CHE's 2!
 

DeletedUser

Guest
*cough* wrong set of stats.

Side 1:
Tribes: EXP EXT
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: G.G I.G *FW* *WW* Riffs =T4H= T4H-W CHE!!!
Players:

Timeframe: Last 3 months

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 485
Side 2: 461
Difference: 24

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 3,584,173
Side 2: 3,614,483
Difference: 30,310

image.php


Less Conquers, more conquered points...

and what's even more entertaining is all of these tribes don't add up to the points of EXP: G.G, I.G, *FW*, *WW*,Riffs
and they aren't all working together like EXP/EXT! :icon_rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
adilisking; Thats only half of EXP's enemies. Not a very representative set of stats...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top