pretty much this terror. He says we wanted to be Virtus badly. He and u should reread all of Jaigs posts. We did not want to be Virtus.
7 member councils fail, you illiterate idiot.
Democracy tribes fail, Dictatorship tribes are better...
Its our style of running our tribe. works very well for us.
But if you're used to democratic rule, its a culture shock to suddenly have two guys you know little about come into your tribe and start changing things.
Its no reflection on TEAM or VIRTUS, both tribe leaderships wanted to try it out.
It didn't work.
No more to be said really.
Excuse me kind sir/ma'am but, I would like to know your reason for this statement. How are democracy tribes failures and Dictatorships better? Me and Karl(Cruddy17) on UK3 lead a small rim tribe in K65, we consider our members to be the best of the K, simply because we deny many daily and barely recruit anyone. Anyhow, Karl(crudz on these forums) or as you all may know him, Cruddy17/Baconpants/Voltan had led or co led many great tribes. He believes in a democracy based tribe. He does of course make the decisions that are supposed to be made by leaders although, he does ask for the tribes opinion on everything recruitment/diplomacy related. It has not failed him once in the many great tribes that he has led. I just really want to know why you believe dictatorship is a better leading style.
pretty much this terror. He says we wanted to be Virtus badly. He and u should reread all of Jaigs posts. We did not want to be Virtus.
Virtus is Virtus
Team is Team
I totally agree with juke,
A highly democratic style worked for TEAM and a highly autocratic style worked for Virtus. If a style of leadership suits the tribe and its members then surely that is the correct style for the tribe. Each individual tribe ever created should be able to find a style that suits them, their is no 'right' and 'wrong' way to lead a tribe (in terms of style). The success of a tribe has far more important factors than the style used to lead it IMO.
Think of the merge and the un-merge as shoving two opposite ends of magnet together.
If anything, a positive to it was the development of friendship and respect between lots of the members in Virtus and TEAM players, that may have not been as strong if merge never happened.
Its our style of running our tribe. works very well for us.
But if you're used to democratic rule, its a culture shock to suddenly have two guys you know little about come into your tribe and start changing things.
Its no reflection on TEAM or VIRTUS, both tribe leaderships wanted to try it out.
It didn't work.
No more to be said really.
There's an awful lot of arguments in this threat considering the concept is really quite simple: The two tribes were run differently, and didn't work well when joined together. Neither is necessarily a better leading style than the other. They were meant to be separate, and they are now separate once again. Accept it and move on. XD
Excuse me kind sir/ma'am but, I would like to know your reason for this statement. How are democracy tribes failures and Dictatorships better? Me and Karl(Cruddy17) on UK3 lead a small rim tribe in K65, we consider our members to be the best of the K, simply because we deny many daily and barely recruit anyone. Anyhow, Karl(crudz on these forums) or as you all may know him, Cruddy17/Baconpants/Voltan had led or co led many great tribes. He believes in a democracy based tribe. He does of course make the decisions that are supposed to be made by leaders although, he does ask for the tribes opinion on everything recruitment/diplomacy related. It has not failed him once in the many great tribes that he has led. I just really want to know why you believe dictatorship is a better leading style.
TEAM RANK 1 in world = democracy
Its a known fact that Dictatorships are better.I personally believe Dictatorships are better.
Neither is better to be honest. A true leader does a mixture of both :/Democracy tribes fail, end of story.
edit
Its a known fact that Dictatorships are better.
7 member council = uneven amount of votes = no dead lock !Democratic tribes (TEAM) still need 1 spokesman, somebody to act for the council, somebody to break a deadlock that might occur with certain discussions.
7 member council = uneven amount of votes = no dead lock !
comon jaigosian enough burning TEAM eh man ?
I think we have all said a piece here, and many points raise, plenty to start a few more thread for sure.
Darth speaks his mind, sometime with more passion than needed but I personally will always expect that from people, To play this game with passion (and he does) is a gift.
Jaigosian I started to write this and looked at what I wrote for Darth and well you two have more in common that you may care to admit. The difference is that you decided what course of action your tribe takes.
Virtue and Team failed on one level only and that was at the top with Barons and Dukes, And there are many reasons for that some are public and some are not (and will stay that way Jaigosian and Darth)
All players both in Virtue and Team tried and should be recognised for the effort they put in.
And Team wish Virtue all the best for the future, hopefully the same will be said from them, but only time will tell.
