Anyone can get rank.1 with 5 coplayers. :icon_rolleyes:
*3
each one of us has 3 co players ..... not hard to count really. Me and Will and Dorin and Brad.
It's pretty funny seeing said account fail to get the looter award.
yeah because they released daily awards like in middle of the day. and also our account was active like 14 hours that day (can't blame us. seeing nobody catching up to us makes us lazy) :icon_redface:
We got the looter the next day though. and even if we never get it, who cares It just means we are not as active as some others to not be able to get the looter with such troopcount.
:icon_biggrin::icon_biggrin::icon_biggrin::icon_biggrin::icon_biggrin:
There is so much more to this game than stuffing an account with 5 others (yes yes we are counting the younger sister who farms and the brother that logs on when a badge wearing co player can't make the time) and farming heaps.
Adrian only sent mails I don't believe he farmed.
Oh and since you're counting like that you forgot to mention my 6 year old cousin who also helped send runs once while I was attending the guests in a party. or the time when my mom logged to my uk16 just to see what I play every day ( weird.... :icon_eek
honestly playing active solo is way better than playing co played accounts. the reason we chose to co play is because we have busy Real lifes. you can't hold that against us as there are players who play 18 hours a day and call it "Solo" . It's their life they can do whatever they want. nobody limited them to playing solo.
You are good but surely it is for the community to say who is best and all I have seen since returning is some mutual love in from fan bois.
fan bois are part of community aren't they?
Anyway we will see how you go I guess but all your accounts have or have had co players so surely your first line should have been, "nobody is better than those that play on my accounts?!"
oh please stop being so pathetic. It's not against the rules to have co players. if you envy us that much, go get some yourself. just because we can't afford to play this game more than couple of hours a day doesn't mean we don't get to be rank 1.
One tribe already saying you need to be vouched for by FOUR players to get an invite!!! So how many folks will get a chance at joining a decent tribe and being taught?
How many will be shown how to play the game. The banter and the what to click when stuff? Or shown how to lead?
Okay so now you're trying to flame us for recruiting good players? btw four players what? Will makes those decisions alone.
Edit: Will just pointed out you werent talking about us even though you were talking about us before and after this part. anyways, It's a game and It's about survival. Learning through trying to survive actually works pretty well. the expectation of every tribe recruiting every noob there is to teach is too high. besides I believe there are some newbies in every good tribe, but they make up for it with their activity. so there goes your point.
Without sounding like a Will lover, he probably is the best active player on uk atm.
Oh please. I'm much better than Will :icon_cool: hence the best current UK player .
I never seen an announcement yet however that the world has been won by a starting account, but only by a tribe.
I'm sure you can state that a starting account gives a good position and all sorts of arguments. But all that matters is the end.
Wrong. How many worlds has Nauzhror won?
All that matters is the end? are you serious? so we have to play like a year in one account in order to achieve " what matters" ? How about we play like 5 worlds in that time and achieve 5 startup achievements? wouldn't that be more fun?
You can compare it with a soccer match. You can have a good striker in team A, scoring a few goals at the start but being exhausted after a while and has to be replaced after a while. And you have team B who might not be the best at early, but working together well and eventually dominating the match.
No-one will care about that good striker in team A as team B has won the match.
terrible example. you have mixed points of exhaustion and losing in the same example. how does any of those 2 resemble our situation? but either way here's an answer
take Cristiano Ronaldo from Real Madrid for example. Is he one of the best strikers there is? (best actually but some are Messi fanbois so meh) Yes he is. did Real Madrid win any cups this year? No. does that mean C.Ronaldo is no longer among the best strikers? (sorry i'm going to answer that since you like giving deluded answers and may answer this obvious question wrong :lol: ) No. He will most likely be nominated the best player of year 2013.
So it's not about individuals. It's about how good you can work together as a tribe.
Does having a top player helps? Yes naturally, but that alone won't cut it in the end.
How about this question. Does having more than few top players help?
And imo: even earlier achievements on earlier worlds playerwise or tribewise don't even matter in my eyes as that's a different world. But that might be just me not caring about names or earlier worlds.
That's debatable. say if you play soccer (using your example) and play as striker, and score at least 5 goals per match. then by the end of the year, you will get to brag about every single match that you scored at least 5 goals, as well as bragging in general. What Will referred to was the brag in general which he has earned.
Firstly, I thought being the best start up player was proven by being a single "Player" on an account? Definitely helps with multiple farmers.
Which do you prefer? multiple farmers or being able to play it all yourself and farm yourself? as you already guessed the point of multiple farmers is because the main player can't be there all day and has a life.
However, I am proud to say our account has no "farmer" and we are all "main players" . most decisions are discussed in skype chat by everyone instead of one player giving out orders and others obeying. Pretty Awesome I know :icon_cool:
Surely we all microfarm at start up and follow a similar build pattern... so doesnt being the best start up player mean the person who is able to have the most consistent access to their account to keep the LC out all day... and an area surrounded by non farmers?
Not necessarily. for example take smelly socks. He had the looter the other day meaning he kept more LCs out than us. does that make his account better than our account? I don't think so.
I dont know Will at all, (I never heard of him before W16) but from what i've seen, the account he is on is rank 1 but I understand its played by 3 people right? And the first village was a freebie under NAP, the second was a free barb... so its easy to hit the heights. I guess if he really is as good as he says then he will stay there for some time right?
Don't you dare give us the "you had it easy" Crap.
Opponents defeated: 56.508 (1.)
that was achieved without a single member supporting us so far (Well we never asked for it) . our first target failed to snipe but still he had over 5 hours to snipe it. so we did take the risk of attacking bigger player when everyone was nobling 1k points villages.
and our 2nd target restarted because he lost all his troops on us trying to backtime us (you can still see it in our profile).
We have worked for all our targets, we have been catted and attacked by many. one doesn't earn rank 1 ODT without going through the biggest wars of the world. so It's safe to say, If anything, we get to use this debate as our point and call it easy for "others" ....
-Milad
