DeletedUser
Guest
It's typical.
I'm really shocked that L0S3 gave Ruffus privs on this world, don't they know his track record for leading? :lol:
It's typical.
I'm really shocked that L0S3 gave Ruffus privs on this world, don't they know his track record for leading? :lol:
DeletedUser
Guest
Surely its his leading he is known for!?
DeletedUser4753
Guest
know he started a few premades that seem to be bigged up and later fall apart, w14 i believe he tried a world vs rank 1 alliance n failed
DeletedUser
Guest
I think I know who anonymous is. :X
DeletedUser6623
Guest
good for you?
DeletedUser
Guest
Even I could hazard a strong guess... anyone can view TW stats.
DeletedUser8924
Guest
The nap was set up with the intentions of looking for somthing more permanent in the furture as seeing ROTN members and the way they had been lead before, i was extreamly looking forward to joining together later on.
The Whole tribe was aware of the Nap as it was clearly added as NAP(to the map) and posted in Anouncements/Important. (as shown in one of my previous posts)
I hear Exp. is now under new leadership Good luck!
DeletedUser6623
Guest
I hear Exp has no-one active with duke privs? :icon_redface:
DeletedUser
Guest
Nah they have one. Lets see if he lasts the next 24 hours.
DeletedUser11708
Guest
Down
DeletedUser11546
Guest
I think the will last for a couple weeks
DeletedUser12062
Guest
Couple of weeks a very very long time
Can cause a LOT of damage both to villages and top peoples reputation in that time :icon_twisted:
Nauzhror
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 106
*yawn*
As much drama as ever I see.
Top players reputations rarely ever get significantly damaged.
If someones reputation can be easily damaged in a couple of weeks they weren't a top player.
Example - I could join this world, get rimmed, restart, get rimmed again, restart again and get rimmed a third time.
It wouldn't likely damage my reputation in any significant way.
Even if I was handily beaten all 3 times the masses would likely jump to my defense and claim I wasn't trying or playing properly.
As a general rule if someone needs to defend their reputation on the forums (ie. others won't do it for them) they were never a top player. The reason is simple: You don't decide if you're a top player. Everyone else makes that decision for you.
EDIT: Before someone decides to point out how hypocritical they think my post is - it should probably be pointed out that while I do consider myself to be a "top player" I'm by no means in the minority, and in fact largely consider myself to be such because so many other people do. I'm not a top player because I say so - I'm a top player because thousands of others have said so.
As much drama as ever I see.
old man respect said:Can cause a LOT of damage both to villages and top peoples reputation in that time
Top players reputations rarely ever get significantly damaged.
If someones reputation can be easily damaged in a couple of weeks they weren't a top player.
Example - I could join this world, get rimmed, restart, get rimmed again, restart again and get rimmed a third time.
It wouldn't likely damage my reputation in any significant way.
Even if I was handily beaten all 3 times the masses would likely jump to my defense and claim I wasn't trying or playing properly.
As a general rule if someone needs to defend their reputation on the forums (ie. others won't do it for them) they were never a top player. The reason is simple: You don't decide if you're a top player. Everyone else makes that decision for you.
EDIT: Before someone decides to point out how hypocritical they think my post is - it should probably be pointed out that while I do consider myself to be a "top player" I'm by no means in the minority, and in fact largely consider myself to be such because so many other people do. I'm not a top player because I say so - I'm a top player because thousands of others have said so.
Last edited:
DeletedUser
Guest
I suspect the comment was made reference to early game leaders, not those who have a successful long term history
for example 'Gain Warnham', ...if my memory serves me correctly
for example 'Gain Warnham', ...if my memory serves me correctly
DeletedUser12062
Guest
My refrences were made in general to the early leaders we read about so far in this world so far.
Some made a poor mistake, some showed in my opinion from what I read weaker than they should leadership skills.
Im a noob not a nub btw I feel for sake of reputation I need to make that clear and maybe shake off the NUB from the word noob.
Reputations take a very long time to establish things were not a one off.
Nauzhror
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 106
I agree that reputations take a long time to establish.
That's exactly why I feel someone who truly has a reputation of being a top player can't easily damage that reputation because everyone fails from time to time - someone who is considered a top player doesn't need to be infallible they just need to succeed far more often than not, so failing on a world wouldn't damage their reputation unless it wasn't very strong to begin with.
DeletedUser
Guest
Error with forum. Ego quota is overloaded by both Mattxx and Nauzhror posting in same thread. Please restart.
DeletedUser10790
Guest
Will has also posted in this thread......
Blue
Blue
DeletedUser6695
Guest
Lol, egos...
I heard more underhand tactics have affected ROTN
I heard more underhand tactics have affected ROTN
DeletedUser11546
Guest
That is correct, I learnt from the best, though I was shocked when I saw that ROTN members don't know how to snipe, receiving a snipe which is two minutes out is just shocking.
