DeletedUser
Guest
These are the recent G.F conquers of Virtus's inactive players:
(Who unluckily enough, we're close to G.F).
Side 1:
Tribes:
Players: JASEYPOO Ravenseye garyredmonds gawasch Aikaramba 2.0
Side 2:
Tribes: G.F
Players:
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers:
Side 1: 30
Side 2: 732
Difference: 702
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 4
Side 2: 136
Difference: 132
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 182,596
Side 2: 4,142,221
Difference: 3,959,625
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 36,745
Side 2: 1,202,902
Difference: 1,166,157
155 conquers - 136 Inactives = 19.
Virtus active G.F conquers: 23.
G.F active Virtus conquers: 19. :icon_rolleyes:
Thats from a tribe with twice/thrice the members and Virtus are desperately trying to noble these inactives also, whilst fighting a war...
So you guys tell me whos winning and whos losing...?
i'll still say G.F is winning....and that too handsomely....if you are at war with a tribe, and that tribe has inactives (by any definition as there seem to be many around here)...and the tribe goes for the inactives...its only smart tactics nothing else....give me an example where a warring tribe has left oppositions inactives for internal nobling and instead went for more active players...either tribes kick their inactives or eat them in time or else respect the fact that villages nobled from inactives do count in the stats....however much you cry over it...what i can understand from this post is that virtus have a grave inactives problem....which is being solved by G.F at the moment :icon_wink: