LC or HC nukes?

DeletedUser6920

Guest
Just to prove a few people wrong.... HC or LC nukes guys?

Just on the Nuke basis nothing eles.

I agree 100% with LC nukes but a few people are arguing the fact. Please give reasons with your answers.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
If someone happened to be using the full HC-strategy, then HC would be in their nuke. The idea of HC in a nuke would be that you are vastly superior than most players defensive wise and in times of war, your nukes can be split apart and the HC can be used for stacking. You're weaker on the offensive, but it is the price to pay for the defense.

Just because you lack the knowledge of something, it doesn't mean that the players are noobs.
 

DeletedUser6920

Guest
lmao not another noob? seriously hc sucks lol i meen pure hc vills for quick responce is ok but hc nukes? Stack a vill and attack ur self then re stack it and ill attack you and we will see who does more damage
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Defence111 said:
lmao not another noob? seriously hc sucks lol i meen pure hc vills for quick responce is ok but hc nukes? Stack a vill and attack ur self then re stack it and ill attack you and we will see who does more damage
Click to expand...

I believe you're the noob. Please go read some guides and learn a few more things about TW. I'd be more kinder to you and maybe tell you why etc. if you weren't being a hypocrite.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Defence111 said:
lmao not another noob? seriously hc sucks lol i meen pure hc vills for quick responce is ok but hc nukes? Stack a vill and attack ur self then re stack it and ill attack you and we will see who does more damage
Click to expand...

Are you calling OpenEye a noob?
 

DeletedUser6057

Guest
Defence111 said:
lmao not another noob? seriously hc sucks lol i meen pure hc vills for quick responce is ok but hc nukes? Stack a vill and attack ur self then re stack it and ill attack you and we will see who does more damage
Click to expand...

What about your member I wUb YoU? Maybe you should boot him. Such a noob with his heavy cav nukes, right?
 

DeletedUser5528

Guest
For me its LC nuke. I know hc has the defensive advantage but lc has the carrying capacity for farming and you can have more as they use less pop space than Hc do.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
ergo exile said:
What about your member I wUb YoU? Maybe you should boot him. Such a noob with his heavy cav nukes, right?
Click to expand...

hahah you have a fat co...
wUb is a noob everyone knows that. :icon_rolleyes: But truly it depends. HC nukes is a very defensive but if done right its a great strategy. Also, you loose on offesnive front but can do a 1:1 ration or a 3:2 ratio to make up for it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
mitchnom said:
hahah you have a fat co...
[COLOR="DarkGreen]wUb is a noob everyone knows that. :icon_rolleyes: But truly it depends. HC nukes is a very defensive but if done right its a great strategy. Also, you loose on offesnive front but can do a 1:1 ration or a 3:2 ratio to make up for it.
Click to expand...


nice bb codes!

I think it actually allows you to have MORE offense because in the end, you have a 1:1 O/D ratio instead of a 1:3. So more O in the end.
(someone correct me if I am wrong, I dont feel like doing the numbers.)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
LC every time, I build HC specifically for defence in either total HC vilages or top up in scout villages.

My main reasoning for LC nukes is that the nuke is an offencive weapon and LC give the better offencive rating, they are also faster and cheaper to build.
 

DeletedUser4147

Guest
mrchief said:
LC every time, I build HC specifically for defence in either total HC vilages or top up in scout villages.

My main reasoning for LC nukes is that the nuke is an offencive weapon and LC give the better offencive rating, they are also faster and cheaper to build.
Click to expand...

when your building a surplus of 6K axes, the cav should be built first anyway :icon_neutral:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
biggsy-32 said:
when your building a surplus of 6K axes, the cav should be built first anyway :icon_neutral:
Click to expand...

Sorry I don't understand the point you are trying to make, I assume that you are trying to disagree in some way, but I never said anything about axes, that was not the question, please explain your pont, cheers.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
biggsy-32 said:
when your building a surplus of 6K axes, the cav should be built first anyway :icon_neutral:
Click to expand...

Yep. I use LC in my O nukes but I can see how HC would benefit some players and I have even played very good players who use HC nukes. Its not my style though as I am too lazy to plan like 4 HC nukes when 2 LC nukes would be enough.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I think I must be old school, I believe in each troop type doing its specialist jobs, and in this equation HC are defence troops.

LC are attack troops.

If you need to clear a village LC do a far better job, at far less expense. So a nuke is LC, Axe and rams.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
mrchief, it is a proven fact that LC are stronger than HC in an offensive situation due to population limits, and I agree with you on that part. However, a nuke can include HC if the player is using the full HC-strategy. You sacrifice stronger nukes for more nukes and more defense.

As for Defence111, I'll let that name calling slide for now. I hope I run into you someday and show you how real players play.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Using HC in nukes means you can have less D vills, which means you can have more O vills, which means you have a stronger O than if you use a normal ratio of O/D and still have the ability to defend well (If done correctly :icon_redface:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top