OH no, The world changes again!

  • Thread starter DeletedUser2154
  • Start date

DeletedUser2961

Guest
So, the state of affairs as I see it so far...... Lrag launched early, and now, to make the stats look not so sad, kick players that are losing villages!! Way to go Lrag.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Well Diane, you do seem to see the world through somewhat W1N-coloured glasses, then. Not unreasonable I suppose, but in this case not offering clear vision.

Two points... while there is some question about interpretation of the start date - launch vs land - there is no question at all who hit first. As follows...

C:3 (745|281) K27 9,758 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-04 06:02:38
C:1 (742|280) K27 9,637 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-04 04:45:22
D:4 (740|271) K27 9,272 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 23:40:10
C:2 (745|284) K27 9,513 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 23:39:24
D:1 (743|273) K27 9,282 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 22:24:27
C:6 (744|281) K27 10,034 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 21:30:50
C:5 (745|283) K27 9,496 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 21:25:04
C:4 (745|280) K27 9,515 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 21:22:15
D:5 (742|275) K27 9,272 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 20:39:16

Plus scouting by Cody (and others, I think).

AS for the kicking issue - I heard you complain about that elsewhere. In fact that player has arranged to coplay a much larger account inside LRAG. That being the case she has deleted. And that being the case, you can hardly be surprised that the old account is no longer within the tribe. Now I did warn you that there could be another reason from the one you assumed.

Just so people are clear about our attitude to this, I include a brief snippet of a recent skype convo...

[29/01/2011 18:26:02] [name deleted]: killed 8 nukes and a train though :D
[29/01/2011 18:32:28] [name deleted]: so what am i doing with [Name deleted]
[29/01/2011 18:32:41] [name deleted]: do i boot then re invite after hes lost em
[29/01/2011 18:32:53] Adam Hugill: no thats pathetic
[29/01/2011 18:32:55] FatTaff: no that's just [Expletive deleted!].
[29/01/2011 18:32:59] Eddy :mad: ©: lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser2154

Guest
I never went looking till pinto launched rams, so keep me out of it
 

DeletedUser2918

Guest
so then FatTaff- Colser launches and then 25 days later LRAG decides to respond?

end of the day it appears that some of your guys jumped the gun. It happens. However the 'moral high ground' some in LRAG like to take in a few skype convos ive seen would appear to have eroded away somewhat :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser2961

Guest
Well Diane, you do seem to see the world through somewhat W1N-coloured glasses, then. Not unreasonable I suppose, but in this case not offering clear vision.

Two points... while there is some question about interpretation of the start date - launch vs land - there is no question at all who hit first. As follows...

C:3 (745|281) K27 9,758 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-04 06:02:38
C:1 (742|280) K27 9,637 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-04 04:45:22
D:4 (740|271) K27 9,272 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 23:40:10
C:2 (745|284) K27 9,513 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 23:39:24
D:1 (743|273) K27 9,282 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 22:24:27
C:6 (744|281) K27 10,034 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 21:30:50
C:5 (745|283) K27 9,496 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 21:25:04
C:4 (745|280) K27 9,515 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 21:22:15
D:5 (742|275) K27 9,272 SCSCutter [LRAG] colser [W1N] 2011-01-03 20:39:16

Plus scouting by Cody (and others, I think).

AS for the kicking issue - I heard you complain about that elsewhere. In fact that player has arranged to coplay a much larger account inside LRAG. That being the case she has deleted. And that being the case, you can hardly be surprised that the old account is no longer within the tribe. Now I did warn you that there could be another reason from the one you assumed.

Just so people are clear about our attitude to this, I include a brief snippet of a recent skype convo...

[29/01/2011 18:26:02] [name deleted]: killed 8 nukes and a train though :D
[29/01/2011 18:32:28] [name deleted]: so what am i doing with [Name deleted]
[29/01/2011 18:32:41] [name deleted]: do i boot then re invite after hes lost em
[29/01/2011 18:32:53] Adam Hugill: no thats pathetic
[29/01/2011 18:32:55] FatTaff: no that's just [Expletive deleted!].
[29/01/2011 18:32:59] Eddy :mad: ©: lol



Good god FatTaff - We must be referring to a completely different player - AGAIN!!

gypsyvixcent on 29.01. at 18:46
What happened?? How come your tribeless?

TotalBlamBlam on 29.01. at 18:50
It's being discussed.

gypsyvixcent on 29.01. at 18:55
I'm having a row with your council in a skype room, if you dont get invited back, I'm flaming them on the publics. Its a war ffs, people are going to lose villages. Are they gonna kick everyone who loses a village?

TotalBlamBlam on 29.01. at 19:03
I might still be invited back, as I said I'm discussing the situation with someone.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
stats

interesting stats here.

Side 1:
Tribes: LRAG, LRAGFO
Side 2:
Tribes: W1N

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers:

Side 1: 58
Side 2: 168
Difference: 110

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 28
Side 2: 16
Difference: 12

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 512,650
Side 2: 1,469,977
Difference: 957,327

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 272,762
Side 2: 135,031
Difference: 137,731

chart






start of the war



Side 1:
Tribes: LRAG, LRAGFO
Side 2:
Tribes: W1N

Timeframe: 01/01/2011 00:00:00 to 05/02/2011 13:22:58

Total conquers:

Side 1: 1,188
Side 2: 2,781
Difference: 1,593

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 69
Side 2: 128
Difference: 59

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 7,331,057
Side 2: 23,485,906
Difference: 16,154,849

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 667,974
Side 2: 1,144,226
Difference: 476,252

chart
 

DeletedUser1942

Guest
No excuses - but the last 48 hours show very little of how the war is going.

The past week is when the war has been going, so gives a true reading. Still, LRAG seem to be putting up more of a fight than there brother/sister/huggling friends at ORC ;)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
........

must say total respect goes to LRAG, i like these stats. havent seen anyone take w1n all the way before.


Side 1:
Tribes: LRAG, LRAGFO
Side 2:
Tribes: W1N

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 186
Side 2: 564
Difference: 378

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 78
Side 2: 57
Difference: 21

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 1,560,736
Side 2: 5,050,393
Difference: 3,489,657

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 764,229
Side 2: 520,366
Difference: 243,863

chart





and last month totals


Side 1:
Tribes: LRAG, LRAGFO
Side 2:
Tribes: W1N

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 899
Side 2: 2,426
Difference: 1,527

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 115
Side 2: 158
Difference: 43

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 5,997,000
Side 2: 20,950,980
Difference: 14,953,980

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,119,858
Side 2: 1,423,931
Difference: 304,073

chart
 

DeletedUser2918

Guest
fair play to LRAG - some nice stats there.

end of the day though a negative village count is a negative village count.......you keep that going week on week then the wars only going in 1 direction. And whether its -1 or -100 the only difference is how long you hold out...
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Us turtles not doing to bad:

Side 1:
Tribes: F.P.B
Side 2:
Tribes: W1N, FREE, IWL, Ugly, UDog

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 534
Side 2: 90
Difference: 444

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4,772,780
Side 2: 832,747
Difference: 3,940,033

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
......

end of the day though a negative village count is a negative village count.......you keep that going week on week then the wars only going in 1 direction. And whether its -1 or -100 the only difference is how long you hold out...


totaly agree bud, BUT u have to look at the size of LRAG to W1N, massive difference in size and villages, so a small negative right now is nothink when u look at the bigger picture.

i have to say also, when w1n say its just there northern group of guys hitting LRAG somethink is wrong. Because your north front is losing villages to a group of LRAG miles behind in the rankings and hundreds of villages behind in growth. your north group is bigger than LRAG is a tribe lol. So no excuses there to be fair.

when u look at at stats not all LRAG members are taking villages just a group of them, same goes for w1ns group, so in conclustion u have to admit that LRAG are doing far better than w1n right now, and possibly they have the best players??

or should i say more reliable players?
 

DeletedUser2918

Guest
yep - good stats bladehog (but who the hell are ugly!!! :lol:)

HardRain - no not all of LRAG are taking villages....but most of them are trying :icon_wink:

i wouldnt agree that LRAG are doing far better - as the stats still say its a negative village count and it doesnt matter if its david vs goliath or evenly matched - losing is losing. And as for "the best players" i'm sure you put that there just to get a reaction...........and i aint biting :icon_biggrin:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
.....

yes i did lol worth a go.

i suppose u w1n so u would know who is attacking from LRAG etc.

my point mainly is saying iv never seen a tribe take so many of w1n in a few weeks, so i respect what they doing and trying to do.

i must admit i was shocked when i saw the stats i didnt give 80mil point LRAG a chance against the machine.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
fair play to LRAG - some nice stats there.

end of the day though a negative village count is a negative village count.......you keep that going week on week then the wars only going in 1 direction. And whether its -1 or -100 the only difference is how long you hold out...


Except it isn't a negative count for the last week, so if LRAG keep taking villages at that pace, it means the total will go positive.

Also, great stats F.P.B
 

DeletedUser

Guest
yep - good stats bladehog (but who the hell are ugly!!! :lol:)

HardRain - no not all of LRAG are taking villages....but most of them are trying :icon_wink:

i wouldnt agree that LRAG are doing far better - as the stats still say its a negative village count and it doesnt matter if its david vs goliath or evenly matched - losing is losing. And as for "the best players" i'm sure you put that there just to get a reaction...........and i aint biting :icon_biggrin:



Most of LRAG arent trying chris as well you know
 

DeletedUser1942

Guest
my point mainly is saying iv never seen a tribe take so many of w1n in a few weeks, so i respect what they doing and trying to do.

When ORC first warred W1N, ORC actually had FAR better stats than that of LRAGs. Therefore, what you've seen isnt of any relevance at all.

Respect does go to them, but for such small gains in the past week (21 vills) they cannot expect a huge amount of respect. They would need to up there gains hugely before it became a worry.

i must admit i was shocked when i saw the stats i didnt give 80mil point LRAG a chance against the machine.

They have a slight gain, that is all. There isnt much to be shocked about - it is still a very level playing field.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
- it is still a very level playing field.

Wow, you guys must be scared if you're admitting its a level playing field. From W1N that's like any other tribe saying that you're awesome, as we know how highly w1n think of themselves.
 
Top