It is for House of Windsor, Sir,Bama or PainCausingLord to answer the main charges here, and it is my understandiung that they can do so without difficulty. But there is one issue I would wish to raise.
Timmy that may make sense from whre you sit... but I think it says everything about a particular attitude to the game that I simply don't buy. For you it's all about the size of the accounts, isn't it? The fact that this obsession game is called "Tribal Wars" hasn't sunk in at all, has it - or rather it has, but for you a tribal war is a set of individuals fighting another set of individuals.
LRAG do it another way. the size of our individuals is of no import, because we are a team. Forty players will launch nukes so that the 41st can send a train - not just once but again and again and again. Players empty their villages to help their mates. Our attacks and our defence are about numerous players working together and being better than one huge one, because they are as well coordinated and between them they have far more flexibility.
You point out that we have no players near the top 20. We haven't - But we ourselves are in the top 20 as a tribe. Both of us, just becoming all of us. Two of the three are top 10.
I have news for you: I don't even know who are the top 20 players - I can guess who some of them will be - and I don't care because it is irrelevant to how I play the game. All I am interested in is the success of my tribe. And you will find that 90% of LRAG and LRAGFO feel the same. At least 90% - maybe all of us. We are in it together to the end. I do not yet speak for LRAGKA, I do not have the right, as I don't - yet - know these people well. But they are welcome, and we will do our best (a n00b best, Chubbs, yes - as if we give a toss) for them, and trust they will do their best for us.