DeletedUser
Guest
In my opinion, Leaders tend to suffer in growth, that is if they work as hard as they should be doing internally, especially at this stage. They tend to have less time to sort out their own account, generally a good leader can end up being an average player, it's learning how to manage time correctly.
But it does depend on circumstances and at this stage, it is hard to tell who will stand and who will fall, but after all, isn't that part of the fun?
I believe Virtus is a good tribe, Leader seems to be down to earth with good values.
I also know a couple of their players and know from experience they are definitely one to watch...
But hell, how could I say anything bad after his last post ^.^
I actually believe its the other way around. I think leaders tend to suffer in growth a bit later into the world when the wars start happening as they are focusing so much on making sure the tribe runs smoothly, ops going well, support being moved and all the other added stress and pressure that goes along with major wars.
At the early stage of the game, I feel leaders can often be the top players in their tribes (Nauz, for example) as the leadership isn't as intense. It obviously also depends on area and so on also.
I'll use myself as an example here - whenever I lead I often am one of the top players to start (top at the moment in my tribe on this world too), but that is because the time leadership consumes isnt so intense yet - however it does pick up, and I usually end up being somewhere in the middle of the tribe (two other leaders like this off the top of my head would be Bloodhood and Emperor Taizu).
So although I do agree with you - I just don't agree with the last four words in your first sentence. :icon_wink:
Personally, the two rim tribes that I'm watching a lot are PoR (mainly because I know a few of them well) and Virtus (good forum presence, and know what your members are capable of.)