DeletedUser
Guest
Oo... walls of text. >_>
I had a wall. :S
Have to agree I'm afraid. Anything disagreed with between tribemembers is best discussed in private rather than the forums in order to preserve image and integrity. It is a basic ploy of leadership.
I was dodging with my O the entire time, so I only lost the D I had in my village which represented a small fraction of my total troops. My wall was destroyed yes... but they lose troops doing so I am not too displeased.
Incorrect, most support arrived and sustained no losses at all (because of distance impairments, most of it arrived after the gangbang, and the players attacking me were probably deterred from attacking once more out of fear (they did not know I was defended adequately after their attacks). I don't need the support anymore; their own fear is my defence once more.
That was attempted; one of my assailants paid the price for his foolhardy actions; one of TuToR's students backtimed him and cleared him, within milliseconds of the assailants troops returning. I will not deny I felt pride at seeing our students display gameplay worthy of a teacher.
Why support when you could backtime? Supporting a player who has no wall, good decision.
I had a wall. :S
You say it's a good membership-leadership relationship that one of your members literally stalks you on the forums contradicting everything you say. K?
Have to agree I'm afraid. Anything disagreed with between tribemembers is best discussed in private rather than the forums in order to preserve image and integrity. It is a basic ploy of leadership.
I was under the impression that he was being catted, and with cats you send rams:
Apparently, the player was being gangbanged making it even more unlikely to have a suitable wall for attacks:
I was dodging with my O the entire time, so I only lost the D I had in my village which represented a small fraction of my total troops. My wall was destroyed yes... but they lose troops doing so I am not too displeased.
It also seems that the support was poorly organised, and meerly died at the arrival at his village.
So, seeing as this player was being "gangbanged" I am predicting, he will be unable to achieve a decent enough wall level for support in time. We've also seen that the support was sent randomly, so a large force at his village to defend against attacks and minimize losses also seems unlikely too.
Incorrect, most support arrived and sustained no losses at all (because of distance impairments, most of it arrived after the gangbang, and the players attacking me were probably deterred from attacking once more out of fear (they did not know I was defended adequately after their attacks). I don't need the support anymore; their own fear is my defence once more.
Backtiming the main attackers, and sending fakes seems like the more logical way to defend this player.
That was attempted; one of my assailants paid the price for his foolhardy actions; one of TuToR's students backtimed him and cleared him, within milliseconds of the assailants troops returning. I will not deny I felt pride at seeing our students display gameplay worthy of a teacher.