DeletedUser
Guest
You are entitled to your poinion, and if you believe EvoLTR will win the war with W.A.R then that is your opinion; and I probablly cannot persuade you otherwise.
However, the facts you presented are irrevelevant and were not really facts at all. I hear you ask why that is, and I will elaborate:
- EvoLTR have not shown in the war that they are more impressive then W.A.R. There is not a substancial gap inenoblements between both tribes to a tribe to disgunish themselves that they are the better and more experienced players that W.A.R.
It is true that EvoLTR have experienced players that are great assets to the war between themselves and W.A.R. An example was the recent W.A.R op on Adellion on the Refuse to Recongnise account. While W.A.R made away with four villages from the R2R account; they suffered over 200 million worths of troops. I believe the estimated figure of lost nukes against the R2R account was a 150 nukes. Not an impressive amount of villages nobled from the R2R account by W.A.R in exchange for a 150 nukes.
But W.A.R also has experienced players as well; good players that are giving a good fight against EvoLTR as much as EvoLTR players are giving to them:
Side 1:
Tribes: evoLTR
Side 2:
Tribes: W.A.R
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers:
Side 1: 665
Side 2: 744
Difference: 79
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 42
Side 2: 40
Difference: 2
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 3,647,630
Side 2: 4,491,853
Difference: 844,223
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 324,037
Side 2: 355,549
Difference: 31,512
This is the last months amount of villages nobled by both EvoLTR and W.A.R against each other, as well as the amount of villages the tribes have nobed overall, and the amount of points their conquers against each other equaled too.
EvoLTR is leading the conquers in the above stats by two villages; this is not a significant lead, if much of a lead at all. W.A.R, by these stats alone, are giving a great fight with EvoLTR. Nobody can argue otherwise; the statistics are crystal clear.
Furthermore, W.A.R have nobled 79 more villages that EvoLTR in the last month in the overall race of village accumulation; the past month stat show that W.A.R had siginificant more growth than EvoLTR did last month. The war between both tribes is having little effect on W.A.R... While EvoLTR has a 79 village gap difference. Perhaps this is due to the amount of members that the tribes have? EvoLTR have 33 member in their tribe, while W.A.R have 36. Perhaps the extra three members are having a significant impact on the 79 village gap difference, as well as W.A.R's impressive ability to keep up with the war against their enemy. My personal opinion? I do not think the three members have a significant gap. Either EvoLTR experienced a lax in activity last members across their membership; perhaps they are hauling noblemen for an operation? Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. We do not know do we? All we know is that W.A.R outgrew EvoLTR in village accumulation and points in the last month than their enemy did.
Conclision to the fact you present; W.A.R are doing extremely well; better than EvoLTR overall.
- EvoLTR have great defenders and attackers; so do W.A.R. I believe this fact that you presented, or rather, your opinion, can be refuted by the above stats and explainations.
- EvoLTR are doing great on another world. Please provide said world that EvoLTR are doing 'great' on?
- GIXXER and those players are strong. Perhaps they will be a pain in the arse for EvoLTR. GIXXER's stats certainly back this:
Side 1:
Tribes: evoLTR
Side 2:
Players: GIXXER
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers:
Side 1: 665
Side 2: 52
Difference: 613
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 5
Side 2: 9
Difference: 4
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 3,647,630
Side 2: 401,917
Difference: 3,245,713
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 41,010
Side 2: 87,153
Difference: 46,143
- Your opinion that EvoLTR will win the war due to size, strength, team work and experience? Does not the current stats, the current size of W.A.R and their strength, team work and experience prove that they are equal to EvoLTR? Even, perhaps, doing a little better?
An excellent read. Very intelligent and informative post, with some very good points. I take back my earlier comments and thank you for your efforts.
I repped you for this.
of course R2R and Bazza are not similar in positioning, and if u are convinced so, then u dont know how to read maps, simple.
u cropping the map , changes the whole story behind who has a better positioning. but that would be a simple lie now wouldn't it ?
You've been told twice already but I guess that's not enough. The map has not been cropped from Adellion's original map. A few lines were added to highlight his point.
Once more for good luck...The map was NOT cropped.
Perhaps it's you who does not know how to read a map, considering you keep chatting about it being cropped. It's the Adellions Map with a few lines added.
The map was NOT cropped.
@ Adellion.
Not sure why you keep going on about this backline thing mate. As stated already, ONE of Bazza's villages was stacked. Just ONE. Everything else was sniped or recapped. The benefits of having that alleged larger backline is pointless tbh.
How many of your R2R villages were stacked? I've got reports showing at a guess around 8-10 stacked villages. That alleged small backline was such a hindrance :icon_biggrin:
So R2R had more stacks than Bazza, but yet Bazza's backline was a much bigger advantage? I'm curious to see how that theory was worked out.
The way I see it, and I'm being very honest in my opinion here;
WARS Op on R2R was a very strong op starting off. Large Firepower and good solid attacking force. It was defended against very well, and met with minimal success. 4 Villages were kept from recaps.
EvolLTR's Op on Bazza was mediocre starting off. Any village attacked was attacked strongly, but the tribal particapition was not overly impressive. It was defended efficiently ( I would say that lol ), and gained minimal success too. 2 villages were gained and kept by EVOLLTR
This safety backline arguement is a bit pointless imo.
Last edited by a moderator: