DeletedUser
Guest
whats the entire takes?
I'm not 100% sure :icon_confused:. It may have been a local mini op.
And Congratulations to Amaze also,
we have continued to work well together.
you have a good point... so I updated it to include TC's op on the 11th Februarty... still seems to be in favour of AFA and amaze to meTimeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 11
Difference: 29
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
What I meant was the last proper op done on A.F.A was 11th Feb where 22 villages were taken. These stats show 12th-19th Feb which biases it massively.
However, congratulations to A.F.A on the op.
I like my stats better, wheres the 22 villages? I presumed he ment net gain, but even if he meant total conquers still 3 short
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: 11/02/2014 00:00:00 to 11/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 67
Difference: 27
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 10
Side 2: 19
Difference: 9
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 356,300
Side 2: 492,642
Difference: 136,342
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 85,116
Side 2: 166,893
Difference: 81,777
Really? You sure about that. On that day in question it was 0-0, why they were not added.
Just for you, in last week------
Side 1:
Tribes: Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers:
Side 1: 101
Side 2: 660
Difference: 559
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 17
Side 2: 2
Difference: 15
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 609,577
Side 2: 3,513,280
Difference: 2,903,703
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 141,465
Side 2: 20,908
Difference: 120,557
Any more brillant logic you want to share?
Why? its already up in a previous post. If your going to act informed could you please read ALL the topic. So no need to spam forums with repeated stats.
You implied TC were kicking Amazes arse hense the removal of them in the stats, clearly they havent in the last week. Hense the stats on their own to prove not all AFA like you were implying