DeletedUser
Guest
whats the entire takes?
DeletedUser12541
Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Forever
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 217
Side 2: 368
Difference: 151
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Last 3 months
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 203
Side 2: 272
Difference: 69
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 85
Side 2: 66
Difference: 19
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 11
Difference: 29
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
Maybe because A.F.A did an op this week and TC didn't?
DeletedUser
Guest
You sure, I do believe they did one on valentines day
DeletedUser
Guest
I'm not 100% sure :icon_confused:. It may have been a local mini op.
DeletedUser
Guest
So it was an op then? on the same scale as afa's and amazes?
DeletedUser
Guest
A small or large scale op is still an op non the less doesn't matter if you send 5 attacks only if your tribe are timing it with others it's an op.
DeletedUser
Guest
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 11
Difference: 29
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
What I meant was the last proper op done on A.F.A was 11th Feb where 22 villages were taken. These stats show 12th-19th Feb which biases it massively.
However, congratulations to A.F.A on the op.
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 11
Difference: 29
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
What I meant was the last proper op done on A.F.A was 11th Feb where 22 villages were taken. These stats show 12th-19th Feb which biases it massively.
However, congratulations to A.F.A on the op.
DeletedUser
Guest
And Congratulations to Amaze also,
we have continued to work well together.
we have continued to work well together.
DeletedUser3371
Guest
Doesn't someone have to win something before you offer congratulations to them?
Oops sorry, I didn't read the whole siggy at first. Please let me make amends.
We would also like to take this opportunity to thank and of course congratulate Spurs, for participating in the Premier League every season. :icon_rolleyes:
DeletedUser
Guest
you have a good point... so I updated it to include TC's op on the 11th Februarty... still seems to be in favour of AFA and amaze to meTimeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 11
Difference: 29
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
What I meant was the last proper op done on A.F.A was 11th Feb where 22 villages were taken. These stats show 12th-19th Feb which biases it massively.
However, congratulations to A.F.A on the op.
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A, Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: 10/02/2014 00:00:00 to 21/02/2014 12:33:45
Total conquers:
Side 1: 439
Side 2: 879
Difference: 440
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 65
Side 2: 33
Difference: 32
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 2,897,319
Side 2: 5,352,053
Difference: 2,454,734
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 525,226
Side 2: 283,163
Difference: 242,063
DeletedUser
Guest
I like my stats better, wheres the 22 villages? I presumed he ment net gain, but even if he meant total conquers still 3 short
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: 11/02/2014 00:00:00 to 11/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 67
Difference: 27
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 10
Side 2: 19
Difference: 9
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 356,300
Side 2: 492,642
Difference: 136,342
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 85,116
Side 2: 166,893
Difference: 81,777
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: 11/02/2014 00:00:00 to 11/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 67
Difference: 27
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 10
Side 2: 19
Difference: 9
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 356,300
Side 2: 492,642
Difference: 136,342
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 85,116
Side 2: 166,893
Difference: 81,777
DeletedUser
Guest
yes but you removed amaze from the graph... they seem to be very important in the war to me...
DeletedUser7215
Guest
well done to A.F.A and Amaze on there op keep it up guys
DeletedUser
Guest
I like my stats better, wheres the 22 villages? I presumed he ment net gain, but even if he meant total conquers still 3 short
Side 1:
Tribes: A.F.A
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: 11/02/2014 00:00:00 to 11/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers:
Side 1: 40
Side 2: 67
Difference: 27
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 10
Side 2: 19
Difference: 9
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 356,300
Side 2: 492,642
Difference: 136,342
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 85,116
Side 2: 166,893
Difference: 81,777
I noticed Amaze was not added to that graph put them on there with afa then let's see the stats. You know aswell as I do they kicked your backside in this past week you got schooled nuff said
DeletedUser
Guest
Really? You sure about that. On that day in question it was 0-0, why they were not added.
Just for you, in last week------
Side 1:
Tribes: Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers:
Side 1: 101
Side 2: 660
Difference: 559
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 17
Side 2: 2
Difference: 15
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 609,577
Side 2: 3,513,280
Difference: 2,903,703
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 141,465
Side 2: 20,908
Difference: 120,557
Any more brillant logic you want to share?
Just for you, in last week------
Side 1:
Tribes: Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers:
Side 1: 101
Side 2: 660
Difference: 559
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 17
Side 2: 2
Difference: 15
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 609,577
Side 2: 3,513,280
Difference: 2,903,703
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 141,465
Side 2: 20,908
Difference: 120,557
Any more brillant logic you want to share?
DeletedUser
Guest
Really? You sure about that. On that day in question it was 0-0, why they were not added.
Just for you, in last week------
Side 1:
Tribes: Amaze
Side 2:
Tribes: TC
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers:
Side 1: 101
Side 2: 660
Difference: 559
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 17
Side 2: 2
Difference: 15
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 609,577
Side 2: 3,513,280
Difference: 2,903,703
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 141,465
Side 2: 20,908
Difference: 120,557
Any more brillant logic you want to share?
Again why you swerving the whole thing... Lol how you just posted a graph with only just amaze in it I clearly said afa and amaze together don't play stupid put both afa and amaze vs TC go on
DeletedUser
Guest
Why? its already up in a previous post. If your going to act informed could you please read ALL the topic. So no need to spam forums with repeated stats.
You implied TC were kicking Amazes arse hense the removal of them in the stats, clearly they havent in the last week. Hense the stats on their own to prove not all AFA like you were implying
You implied TC were kicking Amazes arse hense the removal of them in the stats, clearly they havent in the last week. Hense the stats on their own to prove not all AFA like you were implying
DeletedUser
Guest
Am sayin. If your gonna post stats post the real ones that's A.F.A and Amaze Vs TC regardless it being posted previously you was told not just by me but by someone else to post the real stats with both teams vs TC. Simples
Tell me show me your stats vs them have you actually done anything against those 2 teams post your stats vs both them you alone that is
and i never implied TC was killing amaze.. It's the other way around amaze is kick TC around the field so is afa now post your stats of you alone I wanna see what effort you have actually put in this war against those teams
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser10816
Guest
mmm... its been a while since I've been on here... and I can see the stats whores have been at it again
Yes - we've suffered quite a few losses on a particular account.
Strangely though - I was expecting these to have been lost about 3 months ago when the war started - not now - 3 months on!
What took you so long??
The villages were in a very difficult place to defend - why waste tribal D defending a location that had been idenitfied as an area to write off 3 months ago?
Amaze - just to reassure you, we have never performed a full scale op on you, just distractions and decoys so far
So - my turn for spinning the Stats wheel, to see how I can skew them to make things look all pretty and rosey..?
Ok - the way I see it, you cannot take the stats over a week or month as a clear indication of how a war is going....
For instance...
The first 6 weeks of 2014 were in TC's favour:
Then the following 2 weeks, are in Amaze/AFA's favour:
So all in all - looking over the year so far - its pretty much like I've explained to various people - the world is currently at stale mate.
Now... that doesn't look particularly hopeful for either side right now. Just looks like hard work!
Perhaps a look at the other war stats might help throw some light on which side is gaining the upper hand?
This is a list of conquers, for each tribe - where conquers are greater than 40... anything less is too minor to consider really.
Now - it is clear, that whilst TC is AFA and Amaze's ONLY war - TC is fighting multiple fronts.
Therefore, perhaps a more global view of stats would be more relevant as to the progress of the tribes.
You see.... stats can be made to do lots of things... especially when you're looking for the answer you want to give.
I personally like this view, as it reflects the wars we've been fighting alongside the war with AFA and Amaze.
Perhaps, if they were to include their other wars (if they had any), then this would balance it up?... or... maybe not.. :icon_razz:
Yes - we've suffered quite a few losses on a particular account.
Strangely though - I was expecting these to have been lost about 3 months ago when the war started - not now - 3 months on!
What took you so long??
The villages were in a very difficult place to defend - why waste tribal D defending a location that had been idenitfied as an area to write off 3 months ago?
Amaze - just to reassure you, we have never performed a full scale op on you, just distractions and decoys so far
So - my turn for spinning the Stats wheel, to see how I can skew them to make things look all pretty and rosey..?
Ok - the way I see it, you cannot take the stats over a week or month as a clear indication of how a war is going....
For instance...
The first 6 weeks of 2014 were in TC's favour:
Side 1:
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A
Timeframe: 01/01/2014 00:00:00 to 11/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 109
Side 2: 59
Difference: 50
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 793,358
Side 2: 452,058
Difference: 341,300
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A
Timeframe: 01/01/2014 00:00:00 to 11/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 109
Side 2: 59
Difference: 50
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 793,358
Side 2: 452,058
Difference: 341,300
Then the following 2 weeks, are in Amaze/AFA's favour:
Side 1:
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A
Timeframe: 12/02/2014 00:00:00 to 23/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 18
Side 2: 63
Difference: 45
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 148,975
Side 2: 517,908
Difference: 368,933
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A
Timeframe: 12/02/2014 00:00:00 to 23/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 18
Side 2: 63
Difference: 45
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 148,975
Side 2: 517,908
Difference: 368,933
So all in all - looking over the year so far - its pretty much like I've explained to various people - the world is currently at stale mate.
Side 1:
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A
Timeframe: 01/01/2014 00:00:00 to 23/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 127
Side 2: 122
Difference: 5
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 942,333
Side 2: 969,966
Difference: 27,633
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A
Timeframe: 01/01/2014 00:00:00 to 23/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 127
Side 2: 122
Difference: 5
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 942,333
Side 2: 969,966
Difference: 27,633
Now... that doesn't look particularly hopeful for either side right now. Just looks like hard work!
Perhaps a look at the other war stats might help throw some light on which side is gaining the upper hand?
This is a list of conquers, for each tribe - where conquers are greater than 40... anything less is too minor to consider really.
AFA:
#1 No tribe 2,106 conquers 55.25%
#2 A.F.A 902 conquers 23.66%
#3 TC 185 conquers 4.85%
#4 ER 127 conquers 3.33%
#5 UNDER 124 conquers 3.25%
#6 Amaze 59 conquers 1.55%
#7 nUKe 51 conquers 1.34%
Amaze:
#1 No tribe 1,634 conquers 58.9%
#2 Amaze 586 conquers 21.12%
#3 ~AW~ 145 conquers 5.23%
#4 TC 48 conquers 1.73%
TC:
#1 No tribe 2,349 conquers 39.48%
#2 TC 1,378 conquers 23.16%
#3 RIF 512 conquers 8.61%
#4 A.F.A 277 conquers 4.66%
#5 CATS 170 conquers 2.86%
#6 EM 166 conquers 2.79%
#7 ER 105 conquers 1.76%
#8 Amaze 96 conquers 1.61%
#9 HELL 85 conquers 1.43%
#10 IWL 80 conquers 1.34%
#11 TC. 56 conquers 0.94%
#12 UNDER 54 conquers 0.91%
#13 ROMA 50 conquers 0.84%
#14 Fc 48 conquers 0.81%
#1 No tribe 2,106 conquers 55.25%
#2 A.F.A 902 conquers 23.66%
#3 TC 185 conquers 4.85%
#4 ER 127 conquers 3.33%
#5 UNDER 124 conquers 3.25%
#6 Amaze 59 conquers 1.55%
#7 nUKe 51 conquers 1.34%
Amaze:
#1 No tribe 1,634 conquers 58.9%
#2 Amaze 586 conquers 21.12%
#3 ~AW~ 145 conquers 5.23%
#4 TC 48 conquers 1.73%
TC:
#1 No tribe 2,349 conquers 39.48%
#2 TC 1,378 conquers 23.16%
#3 RIF 512 conquers 8.61%
#4 A.F.A 277 conquers 4.66%
#5 CATS 170 conquers 2.86%
#6 EM 166 conquers 2.79%
#7 ER 105 conquers 1.76%
#8 Amaze 96 conquers 1.61%
#9 HELL 85 conquers 1.43%
#10 IWL 80 conquers 1.34%
#11 TC. 56 conquers 0.94%
#12 UNDER 54 conquers 0.91%
#13 ROMA 50 conquers 0.84%
#14 Fc 48 conquers 0.81%
Now - it is clear, that whilst TC is AFA and Amaze's ONLY war - TC is fighting multiple fronts.
Therefore, perhaps a more global view of stats would be more relevant as to the progress of the tribes.
Side 1:
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A, RIF, EM, IWL, Fc, WSuP, COA
Timeframe: 01/01/2014 00:00:00 to 23/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 639
Side 2: 161
Difference: 478
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 3,855,082
Side 2: 1,219,665
Difference: 2,635,417
Tribes: TC
Side 2:
Tribes: Amaze, A.F.A, RIF, EM, IWL, Fc, WSuP, COA
Timeframe: 01/01/2014 00:00:00 to 23/02/2014 23:59:59
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 639
Side 2: 161
Difference: 478
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 3,855,082
Side 2: 1,219,665
Difference: 2,635,417
You see.... stats can be made to do lots of things... especially when you're looking for the answer you want to give.
I personally like this view, as it reflects the wars we've been fighting alongside the war with AFA and Amaze.
Perhaps, if they were to include their other wars (if they had any), then this would balance it up?... or... maybe not.. :icon_razz:
