DeletedUser4753
Guest
Most deffinetly not me. But a simple read over this conversation does show that quite clearly, I am making the thread a bit more fun rather than having the usual "He is crap" but hey, if you want a serious thread, that's fine.
"pointing out holes in the vocabulry" staying that it is flawed due to the over use of larger words quite clearly isn't pointing out holes, I am just saying, we are playing a game and talking about a game. Where is the need of beefing up a reply when quite simply a "Ha, well you suck" would be sufficient.
I am just looking out for your time mate - THAT'S HOW CONSIDERATE I AM!
So your stating something is inadvertently flawed and decides to profusely use vocabulary as a definitive answer example yet are trying to suggest you are not directly pointing out obscure holes in a discriminative manner?
Seems to be riddled contradiction to the point where one questions another humans ability to grasp a sense of truth and objective reasoning,
I ask but one question, doth though profusely hate higher social classes?