Reduaram said:
MontyPython said:
Reduaram said:
First of all, I'd like to highlight that two of those six greys were a player who, after I cleared and took his main, deleted. So your stat is techinically correct, though in reality it is more like 5:4 players:barbs. And not all of us grab as many 30HQ barbs as we can, Redauram; I actually noble a village based on things that are important: barracks, stables, smithy... you know the ones. And as for being sub-4k, I started a week late, and hence my barbs are behind your barbs. Trying getting all the facts before making assumptions I am a hypocrite or such.
I'd like to ask whether you have actually had a look in my area? With the exception of Avaz to the north and Gwennie the Welsh to the southwest, there is nobody. I assume he is the player against whom your morale doesn't suck? As for Avaz, that would be suicide. There are upwards of 20 Avaz villages within a 4 hour range of support. Any attempt to noble these would be futile. If you disagree then I'd love to know how/why.
Unfortunately we arent all graced with the almost-empty 6k villages you noble. Hold on... almost empty?
You're probably thinking 'and what has this got to do with anything?' The point of this is to illustrate that you are in no position to criticise people who are complaining about turtles. Your largest ODA rise is 17,000 which came from nobling the village 'Kindergarten'. That sounds like a lot when you look at your other rises, but frankly, it is a tiny amount. Especially considering said player had four villages to start with! We were not all graced with your area which appears to so utterly incapable of making any form of defense at all, so for you to have a stab at those who are getting most of yout total ODA everytime they clear a player, for comlaining about turtling, is absurd. You've been lucky in that you have people willing to attack you (over 15,000 ODD will back this up), whereas most of us are yet to have any real incomings at all to date, because players around us would rather noble a barbarian village with lots of points and make more swords/archers in it. SimCity springs to mind.
Skype said:
I don't aim for villages with high HQ...
Yes, I had a look at your area. And here you go and show why I decided to pick your thread apart... You claimed to have won the world, that nobody can touch you, etc etc, yet you are nobling barbs because you are afraid to attack Avaz and Gwennie. It is NOT morale that is the problem (as you claimed), but rather it is your fear or inability to attack the larger players near you.
Yes, I am thinking 'what does this have to do with anything'. What is wrong with me planning well, choosing my targets well and using my skills in order to noble villages with low losses? You think will affect the credibilty of my comments about you? This thread isnt about me, it is about you and how your complaints are based on shaky ground. And if you actually want to take the focus off yourself and put it on me, I suggest you find something substantial to complain about me.
icon_redface and people get bored. Why? isn't invincible.
Why? isn't untouchable.
Why? isn't 'elite'.
Why? is the best tribe on this world. There is no contest.
Why? may not see out the end of this world, what Why? will do is have a blast while we're here. People quit, people get nobled
However, I've yet to see a tribe give us a real run for our money (by this I mean get together a group who can). When the real attacks on us start, maybe we'll spring to life, or maybe we'll outright fail and fall flat on our faces, I mean there's nothing more fun than a clusterfudge of incomings and a late night with a can of Redbull/Relentless.
Give us a bone to chase, and we'll chase it. At the moment, we're top of the pile and aren't going anywhere.. yet.
