DeletedUser
Guest
Can't say i was surprised, tbh
:lol:
this is what world 1 has been missing
tbh i knew this was coming but yer
happy days
damn right despicable and without honour
of course they had to wait until we had started move our troops to the W1N front.. this shows their true nature. hehe, i guess they did not dare attack us if we were prepared for it.
I would say, it shows far less honour to jump on your allies when they are at war, clearly if you felt you could have beaten them by yourselves you would have declared on them a whole lot sooner.
This is from my memory
TR have also used other tribes to do their dirty work swarm. on stl. then invited the selected players and got Knk to rim the rest and then invited knk.
They talk about W1N and big handed tactic's tr have only ever hit small tribes before and then they only hit them when other tribes are hitting. They say we will take your best players join or die!! Or try relocation deals.
Ledzep - STL was hitting and -who- were
They then hit STL - mid battle so weakened. They hit them with swarm -WHO- and some exp attacks.
They declare on W1N only because there is an anti W1N alliance and on paper numbers appear in their favour.
So for all those who have gone before - lets see how you do with tribes more your size!
it was fun to try somethings on W1N and show them what we can do
but not it's tribe 2more our size on us, not really equal. hoped waiting T4H finish FW before.
I would say that makes T4H dishonourable, T4H as parasites, and T4H opportunistic. You could have dropped alliance at any time, stood toe to toe, but you didn't.
I would say that makes T4H dishonourable, T4H as parasites, and T4H opportunistic. You could have dropped alliance at any time, stood toe to toe, but you didn't.
I dont doubt that you have your differences.
But you call them dishonourable, yet through all of the above you kept your alliance, and only now drop it when they are at war with W1N.
I would say that makes T4H dishonourable, T4H as parasites, and T4H opportunistic. You could have dropped alliance at any time, stood toe to toe, but you didn't.
BaskB said:Council have been discussing this in house for almost 2 weeks now so please note this wasnt a knee jerk decision or anything.
I dont doubt that you have your differences.
But you call them dishonourable, yet through all of the above you kept your alliance, and only now drop it when they are at war with W1N.
I would say that makes T4H dishonourable, T4H as parasites, and T4H opportunistic. You could have dropped alliance at any time, stood toe to toe, but you didn't.
I think it is a case of T4H realizing that they have no shot at being the #1 tribe, thus they've decided that being the #1 tribe's favorite pets is preferable.
Not the there is anything wrong with that as the saying goes.
Not really - they got sick of TR's barb munching ways, in T4H's continents, while they had an alliance, so why not declare? It makes no difference that TR are warring us really!
There is no reason not to declare, this is a war game right.
The PnP was poor.
And to make out they are honourable and just, when the reality is they smell blood is poor. Like I said, they could have dropped alliance at any time, warred at any time, but instead waited.
And discussing it for 2 weeks, isnt that how long Abdo has been goading them or is 2 weeks ago when W1N dropped the NAP with them, I can't remember. But personally I think it has more to do with you guys waring them than with barb nobling.
EDIT:
But I guess you cannot have a PnP that says, We declare because W1N declared.
There is no reason not to declare, this is a war game right.
The PnP was poor.
And to make out they are honourable and just, when the reality is they smell blood is poor. Like I said, they could have dropped alliance at any time, warred at any time, but instead waited.
And discussing it for 2 weeks, isnt that how long Abdo has been goading them or is 2 weeks ago when W1N dropped the NAP with them, I can't remember. But personally I think it has more to do with you guys waring them than with barb nobling.
EDIT:
But I guess you cannot have a PnP that says, We declare because W1N declared.