DeletedUser9918
Guest
Best leader cory
Best player willam
Best player willam
Well, you do have more experience than I do with this kind of thing, but with farm assistant, bookmarks, and ingenuity, I can send upwards of 1 attack per second, for an extended period (say an hour), and legally. Oh, and they are all scout report evaluated attacks.At late-game, you're stating with a little time a day, you can out-farm a bot (i.e. startup intensity)? Really? :icon_rolleyes:
Well start up players play a lot longer than a week. Most play to around 100k.
And well cory has led 3-4 rank 1 tribes on the uk server
(even against the backdrop of many other egotistical players).
how so?
tell us why?! Anyway hopefully we will see in Battle of the Tribes!
Look just because I think playing start up only doesn't make you a great player doesn't detract from the fact that it makes you a great start up player (which involves huge commitment and knowledge). This thread is about the greatest UK servers players and leaders and playingor leading a start up acc or tribe does not make you the greatest ever just the best start up player (which is an achievement in its own right)
Am not putting the start up players down just saying that I donlt think they can call themselves the greatest ever.
The thread is very clear what was looking for so don;t change it into making it something its not. A great start player is just that but can't go for greatest ever player as never sticks around.
There are no skills that late game requires that startup doesn't. There are however skills that startup requires that late game doesn't.
Late game is about using the same skills over and over, but it also has a larger margin of error.
ie. You can survive late-game without knowing how to split trains since you can just stack, if you come under heavy attack though in early game being able to split tight trains is essential.
Greatest player might mean most likely to win a world to you, but that doesn't mean it has to to everyone else.
Most of the 'best' players, in terms of skill (ie. not necessarily the players you want in your tribes, but those who are the most knowledgeable and capable of succeeding in a variety of situations when motivated to do so), are the startup players that you're slating. Many of them are less dedicated than the late-game players perhaps, but really, if not having a job and being willing to log in at weird hours of the night defend an account makes someone a great player moreso than an intimate knowledge of the game and its mechanics does then I'm quite sure I don't want to be considered a great player by you.
Best player= Meechan
He's the best you have come across?? wow.
For me..
Best leader = Luke Bishop, led W1 from start to getting near conclusion.
Never played with or against this Cory/montypython guy but he seems a popular choice for the fanboys so i'm going to assume he leads start up tribes for short times then leaves/disbands and also speekz leik tihs so has to be a no from me.
Best player = There is so many excellent players, Luca,Matt,Jaguar,JohnBishop + many more, I am going to go for one i played against and with for quite a while and that is Stefan4. An absolute beast of a player, aggressive as i have ever seen anyone play, not much can stop him from start up to late game.
There are no skills that late game requires that startup doesn't. There are however skills that startup requires that late game doesn't.
Late game is about using the same skills over and over, but it also has a larger margin of error.
ie. You can survive late-game without knowing how to split trains since you can just stack, if you come under heavy attack though in early game being able to split tight trains is essential.
Greatest player might mean most likely to win a world to you, but that doesn't mean it has to to everyone else.
Most of the 'best' players, in terms of skill (ie. not necessarily the players you want in your tribes, but those who are the most knowledgeable and capable of succeeding in a variety of situations when motivated to do so), are the startup players that you're slating. Many of them are less dedicated than the late-game players perhaps, but really, if not having a job and being willing to log in at weird hours of the night defend an account makes someone a great player moreso than an intimate knowledge of the game and its mechanics does then I'm quite sure I don't want to be considered a great player by you.
He's the best you have come across?? wow.
For me..
Best leader = Luke Bishop, led W1 from start to getting near conclusion.
Never played with or against this Cory/montypython guy but he seems a popular choice for the fanboys so i'm going to assume he leads start up tribes for short times then leaves/disbands and also speekz leik tihs so has to be a no from me.
Best player = There is so many excellent players, Luca,Matt,Jaguar,JohnBishop + many more, I am going to go for one i played against and with for quite a while and that is Stefan4. An absolute beast of a player, aggressive as i have ever seen anyone play, not much can stop him from start up to late game.
Best Leader: Obviously Luke Bishop. Running a tribe from early days of UK servers until today is quite a feat and keeping it interesting and not allowing the tribe to fizzle out and die like some servers out there is also worth a mention. His ability to deal with diplomacy well has led W1N to remain top of the rankings for years.
Best Player: Well this is difficult but I personally find it hard to choose between Luke Bishop, Codywasnevergood and Anti-Shaft. But will plump for Anti-Shaft as he was very aggressive and active which led him to be feared for a long time.
Well he clearly stated his reasoning, Luke has led the rank 1 tribe since start up.
uk3 was dominated by Rumble until they quit
Haha! You know Man0 was the man!
M4by3 1 d0, wh7 u c4r3? You ignorance is pretty far up there I must admit. Luke Bishop for leader, ok I can agree. But the players you chose,