olo7 on 04.02. at 18:42
Browneh it would seem you have a problem with me asking questions on an open forum..... Perhaps if the leadership would answer the questions the threads wouldnt end up going off track.
I asked those questions, because it will effect me. Several TR players are leaving TR and want me to have their villages. Around a 100 villages. You will have to ask those players who they dont want the leaders to have them..... I doubt there will be a discussion about this with the leadership as is per the new rule. All i have is asked is what happens?? Nobody has yet answered my question.... so we will have to find out i guess.
You obviously see no merit for barbs and red dots that are assigned privatley to be posted on the forum. So there is no point debating that question.
Browneh on 04.02. at 20:28
I have no problem with the asking of questions however it seems it is you who are unhappy with the quality of answer you get.
1st thing is 1st how do you mean that some TR players have left you about 100 villages do you mean:
1. they have left you 100 villages for you yourself to take and noble.
2. left you 100 villages for you to distribute around the tribe or to players in the tribe
if the answer is the 2nd then i made it clear on the forums what i think the policy is
Browneh said:
I agree with this. but only for players who are in calm none volitile areas of TR held territory like K32/42/30 aslong as they keep the leadership in the know about whats going on
i think i read in the forums recently about a player from K61 who is leaving an area where we are at war where nobling inactives and wasting the inactive players troops would be counter productive i think only in case's like that is when the leadership steps in and denies the request temporeraly
however if it is the 1st one then i think that would be highly selfish of yourself and make you quite a hypocrit
if im wrong in both cases plz clarify for me what you mean and keep in mind im not the leadership im just a K commander.
olo7 on 04.02. at 20:36
The 1st option....(in fact they will stay active until the process is complete)
How is it being hypercritical... i have always said people should be allowed to hand out their villages to whoever they seemed fit... a claim isnt needed because he hasnt gone barb or red. It is for the person leaving, to publish his leaving statment. Not me.
olo7 on 04.02. at 20:37
I just wanted to clarify what the leaders intend to do about this... the answer from LL. Each case will be dealt with on an individual case. Which again is a very diplomatic answer.
Browneh on 04.02. at 20:56
Well like i said im not a part of the centeral leadership so i cant say what they will do.
however if you want my personal opinion you must be an extremely selfish player after all you would not spare 3 nobles a tribal op yet you seem to have the ability to magic about a 100 nobles for inactive players.
what little respect and opinion i had for you is now gone.
and ironicaly at 1st i was fighting your corner.
olo7 on 04.02. at 21:02
Why would i want to noble 3 barb villages, when i know ive got to take 80 + fully developed villages... - I told you i couldnt take 3 barbs villages, but you wanted to check, and made your own mind up.
The reason i am taking these villages is because the player doesnt want the leadership to have them. And you want be to disrespect his wishes and hand control over to the leaders.???