DeletedUser7369
Guest
well I dont think anything is decided yet so it seems early to be gloating
I just gotta say, my friends all thought they meant bi like bi dirty terms when they saw the tribe name
cheating
then i'm sorry, but you don't have proof to back up any of your claims."Bazza is under attack, but let's not send our troops to him, let's let him die because he's a nub and I only want troops to protect my account lololololol also do you have any illegal scripts so I can outgrow noobs and lets betray our allies and declare war on them all because i am the best player ever in the whole wide world of tribalwars and everyone is worse than me in every way"
Its odd that you complain we treat you like dirt, when +PEST- have never complained!
I know its going back a bit, but quite a while ago I believe +PEST- ended their alliance with you as they thought you weren't treating them well. Then when their alliance with us crumbled they went back to you.
I know they're fine with you now and that you help support them, just thought I'd point it out. Perhaps things have improved since then.
As much as I hate to ... can I ask for evidence that Bi! are "cheating" or "dirty" or "selfish" or "individuals" or any number of slanderous words.
We broke off the NAP with 404 a few days before declaring war. And even then there were never any clauses written into the NAP, both sides had no illusions as to a friendly relationship. With ?!? not only did we have players near them working together until the very day when suddenly we were at war with each other, there was an agreement on both sides, which was violated by ?!?, we had no such agreement with 404, therefore nothing underhand went on."dirty"
When you declared on 404 - did you keep to your "agreement" proposals of 48 hrs? I think not. With that in mind why should anyone keep to a proposal that you have never blatantly been able to keep to yourselves.
Running a tribe necessarily involves sacrificing ones own time to help others, so i'd say by being a Baron he's not being overly selfish. Not only has he helped out Bi! as a tribe, but he's also supported individuals numerous times, there's a difference between forum persona and reality, as demonstrated when Nauz when from insufferable to helpful when he became a mod. (note i'm not bashing the mod, just the pre-mod player, he's a lovely helpful player)"selfish"
Def: characterized by or manifesting concern or care only for oneself
- Adellion anyone :icon_twisted:
It's fun to take people on individually, an even battle is more enjoyable. However we have had successful Ops that involved large scale co-operation, however when so many of our threats are regional, i.e. we have players on the border with PEST who are helping out there, we have players on the Vital border, we have players surronded by ?!? there is often a lack of a single decisive enemy, so we its hard to find someone who attacking would be in everyones interest."individuals"
Strange, how many of your members would prefer to go one on one rather than make it a tribal event.
Sorry mate, I wasn't looking for definitions, but proof of validity of a statement, and rhetorical questions just don't stand up to scrutiny, do they?Anything else you'd like me to define for you?
We broke off the NAP with 404 a few days before declaring war. ...
#Running ...
Strange how the requests for one on one's seem to only arise from those with more villas / more points against those who should be "obviously weaker" ... OBVIOUS GOOD FUN :icon_redface:It's fun ....
Sorry mate, I wasn't looking for definitions, but proof of validity of a statement, and rhetorical questions just don't stand up to scrutiny, do they?
And yet I've been told by a previous mod that the top 10 of each world are monitored more closely for obvious infringements. Seems he must have been "just lucky" to not get caught until he switched to Bi! By his own admission he would have lost approx 50% of his villa's for that infringement. And yet he was banned from UK4 fully ... guessing there's another infringement in there somewhere, hacker's anyone?
The latest twist in this saga ... you speak of doing something - I'm not willing to take your word for it, so if you could provide me with some sort of evidence of the above I'd be very grateful. (CHEERS)
Strange how the requests for one on one's seem to only arise from those with more villas / more points against those who should be "obviously weaker" ... OBVIOUS GOOD FUN :icon_redface:
Don't be sorry mate, I'll help you out with the scrutiny :
1. Mggege - FACT, proof of validity of statement (DONE) - not my fault you wish to question it
2. The Declaration - debatable, waiting for you proof of validity of dropping the nap a "few days before"
3. Selfish - I fully apologise for poking fun at Ady, the thing is - he's loving the attention so everyone's a winner
4. Individuals - FACT, proof of validity of statement (DONE) - at least you've agreed this one
There was no mail from any member of Bi! to me about the NAP being stopped
The only thing I had was a good luck message from smile on skype after he had sent his fakes at some of 04 members?
If there's a mail I'd like to have seen it?
But we are all so use to seeing Bi! try to get them sleves out of things with words, by trying to get NAPs and Alliences with most of the top ten tribes, Like I keep saying stop hugging and fight lol
[la]When I refer to your egotistical posts its the off-topic ones (not least of which by your leader) claiming superiority in threads unrelated to Bi! whatsoever. It is most definitely my right to remark on these. As for an ego in general, I can't complain about: as I've stated. I've lead tribes like Splat!, Evolve!, and Ego!!!, where part of our image, our entire goal, was to appear egotistical on the forums. Yet, there are rules to be followed, and the spam on this world's forums are getting out of hand.[/la]
Only this world? Surprisingly its very similar to UK1 forums ... Ade kicks into motor mouth gear and heh presto, everyone stops reading the forums.
Congrats Ade, job done. :icon_twisted:
(In record time too only a few months for this world compared to nearly a year for UK1 :lol
Back on topic.
Bi! really need to get off their high horse. They say they would have respected the 48 hr grace period ... What you got history of respecting it or breaking it? Wind your neck in. You woulda jumped on board the war machine if ya'd heard about it sooner. You're just sore cause for once your intel was behind the times.
Seems the cheating Bi! way is catching up with you ...
I know its going back a bit, but quite a while ago I believe +PEST- ended their alliance with you as they thought you weren't treating them well. Then when their alliance with us crumbled they went back to you.
I know they're fine with you now and that you help support them, just thought I'd point it out. Perhaps things have improved since then.
Is Vital the only tribe Bi! didn't offer a NAP/Alliance too? :lol:
The aptly named clueless
suppose I should knock these out of the park pretty quick.
"dirty"
When you declared on 404 - did you keep to your "agreement" proposals of 48 hrs? I think not. With that in mind why should anyone keep to a proposal that you have never blatantly been able to keep to yourselves.
"selfish"
Def: characterized by or manifesting concern or care only for oneself
- Adellion anyone :icon_twisted:
"individuals"
Strange, how many of your members would prefer to go one on one rather than make it a tribal event.
Anything else you'd like me to define for you?
I agree we never had any arrangement with Bi for termanating the Nap,
And the only action I've seen from Bi is to ask tribes to hug them
Why keep their identities covered then ??
Any one can post a thread like that to cause in house fighting.. unless you forward the actual mail why should we believe you ??
I can say the same about a couple of your players and if you want I can make it look exactly the same as your thread..
If you actually post the unedited version or forward it to me then I for one will actually help you rim them..
No body actually wants crybabies in their tribe and I genuinely believe Bi! wouldn't have them either....
Yeah right, like we would blow their cover. We aren't ?!?, we don't backstab and ignore a 48 hour grace period. We are true to our word. The player in question requested anonymity, hence why we are keeping it anonymous. We aren't so dishonourable, and forging a skype chat is too much effort for me to do tbh.
As for a making up a fake for a few players, try it, I know no one wants to leave Bi!, cause any other tribe is inferior in comparision to us.