DeletedUser7325
Guest
We'd like that.
Lol thats the spirit but I doubt they would like that.
We'd like that.
"Sports in general" I would not agree to really coz If you see watching Rank 1 football team vs Rank 20 aint no fun compared to watching Rank 1 vs Rank 2 (where both teams are as good as each other in most aspects). As a spectator you have less entertainment factor there.
Well you were talking about smaller tribes, who really would be spectators in this case
?It's really starting to annoy me when small tribes complain about the the top tribe and say there is no fun like that.
?
And later you mentioned you are talking about sports in general, well in sports spectators are important part of it.
In fact, spectators usually get flamed in TW/on the forums.
This is why the thread started as some felt there is considerable gap between rank 1 and rank2.Smaller being everyone else? Thus including rank 2, 3 etc?
No one is saying that it makes difference but it happens so why not on TW, ppl can say/shout if they feel about something in certain way.whereas spectators can shout all they want, it won't really do anything.
I can see that.
Anyways here pretty similar situation though in other sports spectators are mostly the ones that play as well i.e. football and so on, its a different thing most dont play on national/international level. So you can say the same for TW, most dont play very competitive but do play tw.
No one is saying that it makes difference but it happens so why not on TW, ppl can say/shout if they feel about something in certain way.
At the last part... What's the point in shouting at something if it won't make a difference? It's like asking a wall to get out of the way so you can pass. I don't see how you draw the line from stupid posts to freedom of speech. Unless you are suggesting that freedom of speech encourages such posts...
At the second part: Yes, it were rhetorical questions, thank you <.<
Far as this thread is concerned, sticking to the topic the whole point was, that if rank 1 tribe has more than double the points of rank 2 tribe then there is less fun. (Thats poster's opinion)
That is the point of this thread if my words are interpreted literally.
However, most people should have read in-between the lines and seen what I was trying to get at. Bi! isn't invincible although they like to think that and I want this challenge but as Polybius said "A good general not only sees the way to victory, he also knows when victory is impossible." By this I mean know no tribe can single handedly take down Bi! at this stage. It's going to need more than one tribe but it's going to need most of all players who are willing to stick to their tribes and not join Bi! or leave as soon as things get hard. This is what I am actually trying to get to. And if people don't do this then there never will be a challenge.
I'm up for the challenge I wanted to know if there are others like me out there, besides my tribe-mates, who are up for it too.
Bolded where you went wrong.
The guy isnt wrong, Bi! is so powerful it would take more than one of the lesser tribes have a hope in taking us.
I've seen more powerful tribes fall at the hands of a weaker tribe than the current nr2.
However, people like imagination to come up with smart plans nowadays so they just troop together like in prehistoric times lol.
Bi! isn't one of them
Also Sweetdeath is right.
Imo if Bi! Falls it will be because of inactivity- w4 is mind numbingly boring because of the lack of attacks...