I don't know, it was probably difficult to log in every so often and queue up a noble for yet another free village.
That's literally all he's had to do. He doesn't farm, he just waits for mines to make resources and then mints a noble and uses it on a free village.
uk30:
42 Foxtrot HATED 3.678.572 14.05.2017
8 Foxtrot HATED 16.971 17.04.2017
3.7 million res hauled on his best day. It's about 6% of the top res hauled in a day on the world.
His W90 account on .net by the way is currently being rimmed. It's lost 258 villages in the past 11 days. He's gained a monumental 20.2 million ODD. Oh wait, that's only 78k ODD per village lost. It's just another instance of poor defending on his part.
The rank 1 ODD account on that world is rank 11, peak of rank 10. It has 5x his ODD with less than half as many villages lost.
He on the other hand was rank 1, and after 11 days of being attacked is now rank 16. So, yeah, he outgrew a properly built account, but he folds like a house of cards when hit.
I understand why people are pointing out that he has nobled internals, but its not like we're all gods and turn down free villages....
Its obvious that the acc farmed very well and was rank 1 looter the majority of the world, which obviously = alot of coins minted and so forth alot of nobled created.
Sometimes i can assure you, that there does come a point where you can have full time recruitment on all your vills and everything building too, but not enough troops to sustain the amount of nobles you have and rather sitting around not using the nobles, an internal or 2 wont hurt and maybe a barb or 2.
I'm not sure on this part but i'm sure alot of barbs were counted that were ex players of the tribe IBF which the star acc was at war with. So not just the star acc but the whole tribe got them to quit (70% sure star had the most war conquerors/member points whatever), so barbs more than (whatever the limit that barbs could grow) shouldnt be looked on so poorly.
Just my quick opinion.
When an account is ~80% offense, it shouldn't have a lack of offense to noble live opponents. That's a fairly important distinction. If you are 35% offense, and are using spare nobles on barbs and internals, that makes a lot more sense since it's actually possible for you to have a surplus of nobles compared to your offense. I'm not positive what % of his villages are actually offense, but the fact he defends so poorly makes me imagine that 80% isn't far off.
There's also a difference between an internal or barb here and there, and them consisting of 56% of your accounts conquers.
As for farming, the account seems to have farmed well, but Shaun's actual account has not done so, so I doubt he is the reason that the star123 account has farmed well. It's all well and good to look at a 4 person account and give each person equal credit for the accounts farming - but that isn't necessarily accurate.
In this case I'm pretty certain that it isn't accurate.
Star123 had over 50,000 plunders in a day at some point. Shaun's .net account at 7.5 million points as opposed to star123 at 4.9 million has peaked with:
37 RazorShark Dist. 7.586 21.01.2017
I've sent almost that many attacks in a day already on uk32.
1 Nauzhror chown 7.139 yesterday
EDIT: I was curious if his .net account had more or less than 56% free villages so I checked.
786 total conquers
94 internals from Dist.
19 from Dist
134 from TEA
100 barb conquers
117 tribeless opponents
59% freebies